H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Radu Albot vs Rogerio Dutra Silva H2H: 0-2
Rogerio Dutra Silva holds a 2–0 lead over Radu Albot in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Rogerio Dutra Silva leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rogerio Dutra Silva won the 2018 Istanbul third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Moldova
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 42
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2018* | Istanbul | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Rogerio Dutra Silva | 6-4 6-4 | Radu Albot | Match data |
| Sep 21, 2017* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Rogerio Dutra Silva | 2-6 6-2 6-2 | Radu Albot | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radu Albot | #490 | #39 | 1,137 | 1,899 | 89 | 139 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Rogerio Dutra Silva | #735 | #63 | 733 | 1,745 | 23 | 59 | 28.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Radu Albot | Rogerio Dutra Silva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #306 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #168 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #121 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2016 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #97 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #158 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #87 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #98 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #46 | 1,817 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #132 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2020 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #93 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #283 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2021 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #123 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #125 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2022 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #103 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #98 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2023 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #131 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #101 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2024 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #163 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #159 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #434 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |