H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Radu Albot vs Tennys Sandgren H2H: 2-0
Radu Albot holds a 2–0 lead over Tennys Sandgren in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Radu Albot leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Radu Albot won the 2019 Atlanta third round 6-4 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Moldova
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 34
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2020 | Hamburg | ATP 500 | Q2 | Clay | Tennys Sandgren | 6-1 7-6(4) | Radu Albot | Match data |
| Jul 25, 2019* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Radu Albot | 6-4 7-6(4) | Tennys Sandgren | Match data |
| May 28, 2019* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Radu Albot | 7-6(3) 7-6(1) 3-6 6-1 | Tennys Sandgren | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radu Albot | #490 | #39 | 1,137 | 1,899 | 89 | 139 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tennys Sandgren | #1,243 | #41 | 1,091 | 1,870 | 47 | 75 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Radu Albot | Tennys Sandgren | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 24 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #168 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #121 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #96 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #97 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #61 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #87 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #68 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2018 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #98 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #49 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2019 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #46 | 1,817 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #96 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2020 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #93 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2021 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #123 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2022 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #103 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #506 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2023 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #131 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2024 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #163 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #434 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |