H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Raemon Sluiter vs Alexander Waske H2H: 1-1
Raemon Sluiter and Alexander Waske are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Alexander Waske leads 1–0 on carpet, while Raemon Sluiter leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Alexander Waske won the 2005 Ho Chi Minh City third round 7-6(3) 6-7(4) 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 51
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2005* | Ho Chi Minh City | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Alexander Waske | 7-6(3) 6-7(4) 7-6(7) | Raemon Sluiter | Match data |
| Jul 17, 2003* | Amersfoort | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Raemon Sluiter | 6-4 6-3 | Alexander Waske | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raemon Sluiter | #1,007 | #46 | 742 | 1,749 | 84 | 121 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Alexander Waske | #571 | #89 | 455 | 1,629 | 27 | 62 | 30.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Raemon Sluiter | Alexander Waske | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #716 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #241 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #95 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2001 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #131 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2002 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #71 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2003 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #59 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2004 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #82 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2005 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #106 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #122 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2006 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #119 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–18 | 10.0% | #157 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #169 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #134 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1040 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #122 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2009 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #197 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #109 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #242 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |