H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Raemon Sluiter vs Davide Sanguinetti H2H: 1-0
Raemon Sluiter holds a 1–0 lead over Davide Sanguinetti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Raemon Sluiter leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Raemon Sluiter won the 2003 Auckland third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 53
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2003* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Raemon Sluiter | 6-3 6-3 | Davide Sanguinetti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raemon Sluiter | #1,007 | #46 | 742 | 1,749 | 84 | 121 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Davide Sanguinetti | #1,080 | #42 | 874 | 1,771 | 157 | 233 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Raemon Sluiter | Davide Sanguinetti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #716 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #241 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #95 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #131 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2002 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #71 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #95 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #59 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #48 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #82 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #120 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2005 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #106 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #65 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2006 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #119 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 10–27 | 27.0% | #91 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #169 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #46 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1040 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #65 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2009 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #197 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #110 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 9–24 | 27.3% | #107 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #270 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 |