H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Raemon Sluiter vs Ivan Navarro H2H: 1-0
Raemon Sluiter holds a 1–0 lead over Ivan Navarro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Raemon Sluiter leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Raemon Sluiter won the 2009 S Hertogenbosch semifinal 6-7(5) 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2009* | S Hertogenbosch | ATP 250 | SF | Grass | Raemon Sluiter | 6-7(5) 6-2 6-3 | Ivan Navarro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raemon Sluiter | #1,007 | #46 | 742 | 1,749 | 84 | 121 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ivan Navarro | #1,929 | #67 | 1,108 | 1,627 | 35 | 65 | 35.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Raemon Sluiter | Ivan Navarro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #716 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #241 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #95 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #131 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #138 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #71 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #128 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #59 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #124 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #82 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #74 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2005 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #106 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #127 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2006 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #119 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #193 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #169 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1040 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #231 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2009 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #197 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |