H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Rafael Nadal vs Joao Sousa H2H: 3-0
Rafael Nadal holds a 3–0 lead over Joao Sousa in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Rafael Nadal leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Rafael Nadal won the 2019 Wimbledon fourth round 6-2 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 40
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
POR
Age 37
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2019* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Rafael Nadal | 6-2 6-2 6-2 | Joao Sousa | Match data |
| May 7, 2016* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-0 4-6 6-3 | Joao Sousa | Match data |
| Feb 22, 2014* | Rio de Janeiro | ATP 500 | QF | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-1 6-0 | Joao Sousa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rafael Nadal | #175 | #1 | 15,390 | 2,500 | 1,045 | 225 | 82.3% | 22 | 36 | 0 | 18 | 15 | 91 |
| Joao Sousa | #954 | #28 | 1,355 | 1,917 | 189 | 247 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rafael Nadal | Joao Sousa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #200 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2003 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #49 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2004 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #51 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2005 | 77–10 | 88.5% | #2 | 2,155 | 1 | 12 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #592 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2006 | 58–12 | 82.9% | #2 | 2,129 | 2 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2007 | 71–15 | 82.6% | #2 | 2,154 | 3 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2008 | 73–11 | 86.9% | #1 | 2,254 | 5 | 30 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #192 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 64–14 | 82.1% | #2 | 2,176 | 6 | 35 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 71–10 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,292 | 9 | 42 | 2013 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #49 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2011 | 64–15 | 81.0% | #2 | 2,260 | 10 | 45 | 2014 | 23–33 | 41.1% | #54 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2012 | 42–7 | 85.7% | #4 | 2,333 | 11 | 49 | 2015 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #33 | 1,904 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2013 | 75–7 | 91.5% | #1 | 2,437 | 13 | 59 | 2016 | 24–32 | 42.9% | #43 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2014 | 49–11 | 81.7% | #3 | 2,270 | 14 | 63 | 2017 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #57 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2015 | 60–20 | 75.0% | #5 | 2,231 | 14 | 66 | 2018 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #44 | 1,783 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2016 | 36–13 | 73.5% | #9 | 2,123 | 14 | 68 | 2019 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #60 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2017 | 67–12 | 84.8% | #1 | 2,277 | 16 | 74 | 2020 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2018 | 43–4 | 91.5% | #2 | 2,339 | 17 | 79 | 2021 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #140 | 1,545 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2019 | 54–9 | 85.7% | #1 | 2,345 | 19 | 83 | 2022 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #82 | 1,565 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 2020 | 23–5 | 82.1% | #2 | 2,299 | 20 | 85 | 2023 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #249 | 1,509 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | 2021 | 24–5 | 82.8% | #6 | 2,269 | 20 | 87 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #726 | 1,503 | 0 | 4 |
| 36 | 2022 | 40–9 | 81.6% | #2 | 2,194 | 22 | 91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #670 | 2,155 | 22 | 91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2024 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #153 | 2,046 | 22 | 91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |