H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Rafael Nadal vs Milos Raonic H2H: 7-2

Rafael Nadal holds a 7–2 lead over Milos Raonic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Rafael Nadal leads 6–2 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Rafael Nadal won the 2017 Australian Open quarterfinal 6-4 7-6(7) 6-4.

ESP Age 40 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
7 2
9 main draw meetings
CAN Age 35 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 26, 2017* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Rafael Nadal #9 6-4 7-6(7) 6-4 Milos Raonic #3 Match data
Jan 7, 2017* Brisbane ATP 250 QF Hard Milos Raonic #3 4-6 6-3 6-4 Rafael Nadal #9 Match data
Oct 16, 2015* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Rafael Nadal #7 6-3 7-6(3) Milos Raonic #9 Match data
Mar 20, 2015* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Milos Raonic #6 4-6 7-6(10) 7-5 Rafael Nadal #3 Match data
Mar 28, 2014* Miami Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Rafael Nadal #1 4-6 6-2 6-4 Milos Raonic #12 Match data
Aug 11, 2013* Canada Masters Masters 1000 F Hard Rafael Nadal #4 6-2 6-2 Milos Raonic #13 Match data
Apr 27, 2013* Barcelona ATP 500 SF Clay Rafael Nadal #5 6-4 6-0 Milos Raonic #13 Match data
Oct 7, 2011* Tokyo ATP 500 R16 Hard Rafael Nadal #2 7-5 6-3 Milos Raonic #30 Match data
Oct 8, 2010* Tokyo ATP 500 R16 Hard Rafael Nadal #1 6-4 6-4 Milos Raonic #200 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Rafael Nadal #175 #1 15,390 2,500 1,045 225 82.3% 22 36 0 18 15 91
Milos Raonic #634 #3 5,450 2,246 369 186 66.5% 0 0 0 1 7 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rafael Nadal Milos Raonic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–1 50.0% #200 1,508 0 0
17 2003 14–11 56.0% #49 1,640 0 0
18 2004 27–17 61.4% #51 1,735 0 1 2009 0–1 0.0% #373 1,535 0 0
19 2005 77–10 88.5% #2 2,155 1 12 2010 3–4 42.9% #156 1,651 0 0
20 2006 58–12 82.9% #2 2,129 2 17 2011 30–18 62.5% #31 1,839 0 1
21 2007 71–15 82.6% #2 2,154 3 23 2012 42–20 67.7% #13 1,987 0 3
22 2008 73–11 86.9% #1 2,254 5 30 2013 41–21 66.1% #11 2,034 0 5
23 2009 64–14 82.1% #2 2,176 6 35 2014 47–20 70.1% #8 2,087 0 6
24 2010 71–10 87.7% #1 2,292 9 42 2015 32–15 68.1% #14 2,047 0 7
25 2011 64–15 81.0% #2 2,260 10 45 2016 52–19 73.2% #3 2,143 0 8
26 2012 42–7 85.7% #4 2,333 11 49 2017 29–14 67.4% #24 2,053 0 8
27 2013 75–7 91.5% #1 2,437 13 59 2018 31–18 63.3% #18 1,952 0 8
28 2014 49–11 81.7% #3 2,270 14 63 2019 23–13 63.9% #31 1,919 0 8
29 2015 60–20 75.0% #5 2,231 14 66 2020 23–10 69.7% #14 1,996 0 8
30 2016 36–13 73.5% #9 2,123 14 68 2021 6–4 60.0% #70 1,964 0 8
31 2017 67–12 84.8% #1 2,277 16 74
32 2018 43–4 91.5% #2 2,339 17 79 2023 4–4 50.0% #317 1,909 0 8
33 2019 54–9 85.7% #1 2,345 19 83 2024 6–5 54.5% #238 1,903 0 8
34 2020 23–5 82.1% #2 2,299 20 85
35 2021 24–5 82.8% #6 2,269 20 87
36 2022 40–9 81.6% #2 2,194 22 91
37 2023 1–1 50.0% #670 2,155 22 91
38 2024 11–6 64.7% #153 2,046 22 91