H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Rafael Nadal vs Pablo Cuevas H2H: 4-1

Rafael Nadal holds a 4–1 lead over Pablo Cuevas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Rafael Nadal leads 2–1 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rafael Nadal won the 2017 Paris Masters fourth round 6-3 6-7(5) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rafael Nadal
ESP Age 40 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Pablo Cuevas
URU Age 40 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 3, 2017* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Rafael Nadal #1 6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 Pablo Cuevas #36 Match data
Aug 17, 2016* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Rafael Nadal #5 6-1 7-6(4) Pablo Cuevas #19 Match data
Feb 20, 2016* Rio de Janeiro ATP 250 SF Clay Pablo Cuevas #45 6-7(6) 7-6(3) 6-4 Rafael Nadal #5 Match data
Aug 1, 2015* Hamburg ATP 500 QF Clay Rafael Nadal #10 6-3 6-2 Pablo Cuevas #31 Match data
Feb 21, 2015* Rio de Janeiro ATP 500 QF Clay Rafael Nadal #3 4-6 7-5 6-0 Pablo Cuevas #23 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Rafael Nadal #175 #1 15,390 2,500 1,045 225 82.3% 22 36 0 18 15 91
Pablo Cuevas #841 #19 1,865 1,960 211 212 49.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rafael Nadal Pablo Cuevas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–1 50.0% #200 1,508 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 14–11 56.0% #49 1,640 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 27–17 61.4% #51 1,735 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2005 77–10 88.5% #2 2,155 1 12 — — — — — — —
20 2006 58–12 82.9% #2 2,129 2 17 — — — — — — —
21 2007 71–15 82.6% #2 2,154 3 23 2007 0–1 0.0% #113 1,551 0 0
22 2008 73–11 86.9% #1 2,254 5 30 2008 8–13 38.1% #142 1,631 0 0
23 2009 64–14 82.1% #2 2,176 6 35 2009 18–15 54.5% #50 1,744 0 0
24 2010 71–10 87.7% #1 2,292 9 42 2010 20–22 47.6% #63 1,760 0 0
25 2011 64–15 81.0% #2 2,260 10 45 2011 11–13 45.8% #142 1,743 0 0
26 2012 42–7 85.7% #4 2,333 11 49 — — — — — — —
27 2013 75–7 91.5% #1 2,437 13 59 2013 2–4 33.3% #220 1,718 0 0
28 2014 49–11 81.7% #3 2,270 14 63 2014 17–12 58.6% #30 1,842 0 2
29 2015 60–20 75.0% #5 2,231 14 66 2015 28–25 52.8% #40 1,815 0 3
30 2016 36–13 73.5% #9 2,123 14 68 2016 33–22 60.0% #22 1,818 0 5
31 2017 67–12 84.8% #1 2,277 16 74 2017 20–21 48.8% #32 1,788 0 6
32 2018 43–4 91.5% #2 2,339 17 79 2018 13–14 48.1% #88 1,766 0 6
33 2019 54–9 85.7% #1 2,345 19 83 2019 22–23 48.9% #45 1,740 0 6
34 2020 23–5 82.1% #2 2,299 20 85 2020 7–10 41.2% #67 1,691 0 6
35 2021 24–5 82.8% #6 2,269 20 87 2021 9–11 45.0% #97 1,651 0 6
36 2022 40–9 81.6% #2 2,194 22 91 2022 3–6 33.3% #269 1,654 0 6
37 2023 1–1 50.0% #670 2,155 22 91 — — — — — — —
38 2024 11–6 64.7% #153 2,046 22 91 — — — — — — —