H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Rainer Schuettler vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver H2H: 1-0
Rainer Schuettler holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Gimeno-Traver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rainer Schuettler leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Rainer Schuettler won the 2010 Queen's Club second round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2010* | Queen's Club | ATP 500 | R64 | Grass | Rainer Schuettler | 6-1 6-2 | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rainer Schuettler | #1,007 | #5 | 3,205 | 1,989 | 313 | 323 | 49.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Daniel Gimeno-Traver | #1,222 | #48 | 998 | 1,809 | 95 | 169 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Rainer Schuettler | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #446 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #117 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #124 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #267 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #48 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #45 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #72 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 33–31 | 51.6% | #43 | 1,780 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #56 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 38–29 | 56.7% | #33 | 1,715 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #107 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 70–27 | 72.2% | #6 | 1,956 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #70 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #42 | 1,718 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #77 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #88 | 1,675 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #112 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #97 | 1,536 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #98 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #99 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #115 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #33 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #85 | 1,641 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #84 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #132 | 1,648 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |