H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Rainer Schuettler vs Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo H2H: 0-1
Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo holds a 1–0 lead over Rainer Schuettler in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo won the 2009 Casablanca third round 6-4 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2009* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | 6-4 7-6(5) | Rainer Schuettler | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rainer Schuettler | #1,007 | #5 | 3,205 | 1,989 | 313 | 323 | 49.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | #1,153 | #50 | 826 | 1,704 | 68 | 133 | 33.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Rainer Schuettler | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #446 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #117 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #124 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #80 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #48 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #130 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #45 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 33–31 | 51.6% | #43 | 1,780 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #57 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 38–29 | 56.7% | #33 | 1,715 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 70–27 | 72.2% | #6 | 1,956 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #121 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #42 | 1,718 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #88 | 1,675 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #77 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #97 | 1,536 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #99 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #91 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #33 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #166 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #85 | 1,641 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #224 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #84 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #132 | 1,648 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |