H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Rajeev Ram vs Lukas Lacko H2H: 1-0

Rajeev Ram holds a 1–0 lead over Lukas Lacko in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rajeev Ram leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Rajeev Ram won the 2013 Wimbledon first round 7-5 6-4 6-7(2) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rajeev Ram
USA Age 42 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Lukas Lacko
SVK Age 38 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Rajeev Ram #86 7-5 6-4 6-7(2) 6-2 Lukas Lacko #79 Match data Jun 26, 2013* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rajeev Ram #1,076 #56 826 1,747 57 94 37.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Lukas Lacko #1,505 #44 917 1,838 81 135 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rajeev Ram Lukas Lacko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2003 1–1 50.0% — 1,492 0 0 2007 0–2 0.0% #139 1,499 0 0
20 2004 1–3 25.0% #297 1,474 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #325 1,480 0 0
21 2005 2–2 50.0% #195 1,490 0 0 2009 1–3 25.0% #82 1,607 0 0
22 2006 0–1 0.0% #197 1,457 0 0 2010 16–21 43.2% #89 1,669 0 0
23 2007 0–1 0.0% #253 1,417 0 0 2011 4–7 36.4% #112 1,670 0 0
24 2008 2–4 33.3% #190 1,478 0 0 2012 12–19 38.7% #51 1,644 0 0
25 2009 8–6 57.1% #79 1,587 0 1 2013 11–16 40.7% #81 1,667 0 0
26 2010 6–18 25.0% #184 1,591 0 1 2014 11–17 39.3% #94 1,733 0 0
27 2011 2–3 40.0% #149 1,606 0 1 2015 2–12 14.3% #110 1,647 0 0
28 2012 7–9 43.8% #132 1,636 0 1 2016 4–7 36.4% #122 1,682 0 0
29 2013 4–11 26.7% #127 1,646 0 1 2017 7–10 41.2% #92 1,740 0 0
30 2014 3–7 30.0% #139 1,660 0 1 2018 11–16 40.7% #114 1,677 0 0
31 2015 7–6 53.8% #89 1,654 0 2 2019 1–3 25.0% #183 1,579 0 0
32 2016 12–19 38.7% #129 1,616 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2017 2–2 50.0% #353 1,582 0 2 2021 1–1 50.0% #190 1,497 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rajeev Ram Lukas Lacko
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2004 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2005 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
22 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 12 14 26 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2008 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2012 9 12 21 42.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2009 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3% 2013 11 13 24 45.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2010 4 12 16 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2014 9 13 22 40.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 2011 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 2012 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 2016 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 2013 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 2017 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
30 2014 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2018 6 13 19 31.6% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5%
31 2015 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 5 0 5 100.0% 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2016 9 11 20 45.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2021 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
Career — 34 71 105 32.4% 4 7 11 36.4% 19 16 35 54.3% — 60 95 155 38.7% 2 14 16 12.5% 19 26 45 42.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 150/151 of Rajeev Ram's and 215/216 of Lukas Lacko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Rajeev Ram Lukas Lacko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2002 1/1 3.0 3.0 41.5% 55.6% 47.4% 60.0% 50.0% 50.8% 31.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 2/2 4.5 7.0 45.7% 78.9% 42.5% 55.0% 52.8% 59.1% 39.8% 2007 2/2 3.0 3.0 58.5% 59.7% 48.3% 32.1% 8.3% 55.0% 22.6%
20 2004 4/4 4.8 5.0 54.3% 75.1% 44.7% 56.9% 44.6% 61.5% 28.2% 2008 1/1 8.0 7.0 54.5% 70.9% 47.0% 64.7% 28.6% 60.0% 31.1%
21 2005 4/4 11.3 3.8 54.9% 75.5% 45.8% 56.4% 54.3% 62.1% 34.7% 2009 4/4 5.5 2.0 64.4% 71.7% 48.3% 67.5% 21.5% 63.4% 24.6%
22 2006 1/1 2.0 1.0 68.9% 74.5% 34.8% 0.0% 100.0% 62.2% 26.5% 2010 37/37 6.7 2.6 58.6% 72.6% 50.4% 55.4% 41.7% 63.4% 36.0%
23 2007 1/1 6.0 4.0 59.0% 71.4% 52.9% 55.6% 33.3% 63.9% 41.8% 2011 11/11 6.2 3.4 57.9% 66.4% 48.8% 61.5% 49.0% 59.2% 32.9%
24 2008 6/6 6.0 1.5 63.5% 69.6% 41.8% 45.8% 44.2% 59.3% 32.5% 2012 30/31 6.3 2.0 60.2% 68.3% 49.2% 50.9% 38.9% 60.9% 34.2%
25 2009 14/14 9.1 2.6 58.3% 77.3% 53.3% 73.2% 36.0% 67.3% 33.0% 2013 27/27 5.7 2.8 57.8% 68.4% 48.1% 53.4% 37.5% 59.7% 35.6%
26 2010 24/24 10.2 3.3 58.5% 71.2% 47.0% 42.4% 32.4% 61.1% 28.1% 2014 28/28 4.9 2.6 57.9% 72.2% 50.4% 46.3% 46.3% 63.1% 33.4%
27 2011 5/5 4.2 2.0 62.1% 70.2% 44.7% 44.7% 54.2% 61.1% 30.3% 2015 14/14 7.6 2.4 60.6% 66.1% 48.3% 52.4% 18.2% 59.5% 28.3%
28 2012 16/16 5.1 2.5 58.3% 74.9% 48.0% 58.8% 40.8% 63.4% 33.3% 2016 11/11 5.7 3.3 56.9% 69.7% 49.9% 52.4% 53.8% 60.8% 31.2%
29 2013 15/15 7.4 2.6 61.6% 69.7% 46.1% 58.8% 39.6% 60.8% 33.6% 2017 17/17 7.2 2.2 57.4% 74.0% 56.2% 58.3% 35.3% 65.9% 33.4%
30 2014 10/10 6.1 2.8 62.0% 70.2% 48.9% 62.0% 32.6% 62.2% 31.9% 2018 27/27 8.0 3.1 57.1% 74.5% 51.2% 48.5% 37.5% 64.4% 34.5%
31 2015 13/13 9.8 2.4 63.0% 75.6% 53.0% 65.0% 44.1% 67.1% 31.1% 2019 4/4 5.3 2.3 61.2% 71.4% 49.5% 68.5% 8.3% 62.5% 28.2%
32 2016 30/31 7.2 3.0 63.5% 72.6% 50.5% 60.9% 35.2% 64.4% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 4/4 6.8 4.3 55.8% 74.6% 53.0% 69.8% 22.4% 65.2% 32.7% 2021 2/2 4.0 1.5 62.4% 71.8% 63.0% 62.5% 16.7% 68.7% 32.3%
Career — 150/151 7.6 2.9 60.2% 72.8% 48.6% 57.4% 38.6% 63.1% 32.0% — 215/216 6.4 2.6 58.5% 70.7% 50.3% 53.0% 38.2% 62.2% 33.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rajeev Ram Lukas Lacko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2001 1486 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2002 1479 99.7 +2.35 +0.19 0.641 41.8% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.13 2006 1483 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 1493 105.3 -0.85 +0.13 0.972 50.4% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.02 2007 1499 101.9 +1.81 -2.71 0.502 39.5% — — — 16.7% -2.67 — — — +0.02
20 2004 1474 102.9 -3.28 -0.64 0.731 44.5% +28 — — 27.3% -1.55 1–0 1–1 — +0.23 2008 1480 94.2 -0.69 -1.07 0.779 46.8% — — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–1 — +0.29
21 2005 1490 105.6 -0.27 -2.37 0.916 49.5% +13 — — 54.5% 0.00 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.22 2009 1607 112.9 -1.36 -0.52 0.671 46.0% — — +49 30.0% -0.80 0–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.10
22 2006 1458 100.0 +0.64 -0.34 0.700 45.1% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.05 2010 1670 135.5 +0.10 -0.24 0.982 49.4% -21 -170 -17 45.5% -0.57 6–12 (33%) 15–6 (71%) — -0.83
23 2007 1418 101.5 -4.12 -2.14 1.157 51.3% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.10 2011 1670 132.6 -1.32 -1.02 0.806 46.9% +1 — — 37.5% -0.75 3–3 (50%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.54
24 2008 1479 114.5 -1.05 -1.49 0.798 46.4% +22 — — 40.0% -0.80 0–1 3–3 (50%) — +0.19 2012 1644 139.6 -1.32 -1.68 0.874 47.5% +20 -213 +119 38.6% -0.76 6–3 (67%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.47
25 2009 1587 122.4 +1.13 -1.70 1.010 50.2% -72 — +148 52.8% +0.11 3–1 (75%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.97 2013 1668 139.8 -2.67 -1.18 0.882 47.9% +30 — — 45.6% -0.69 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) — -0.64
26 2010 1592 116.0 -1.64 -5.51 0.722 44.9% -24 — +108 33.3% -1.42 3–6 (33%) 7–6 (54%) — +0.56 2014 1734 137.9 -0.40 -1.90 0.904 48.4% +3 — -21 39.4% -0.62 2–3 (40%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.19
27 2011 1606 115.8 -0.85 -2.60 0.778 45.9% +3 — — 50.0% -0.50 1–1 0–1 — +0.01 2015 1648 120.8 -3.25 -3.69 0.699 44.0% -38 — +63 26.2% -1.62 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.16
28 2012 1636 116.2 -0.05 -3.04 0.910 48.7% -41 — +70 46.9% -0.37 0–1 4–3 (57%) — +1.50 2016 1682 124.0 -2.47 -1.63 0.798 46.8% -124 — +133 38.5% -0.69 1–0 2–3 (40%) — +0.21
29 2013 1647 124.3 -1.42 -2.56 0.856 47.5% -6 — +7 40.0% -0.65 0–5 (0%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.29 2017 1740 131.9 +1.11 -2.04 0.978 49.7% -14 — +51 40.5% -0.36 1–1 2–4 (33%) — +0.17
30 2014 1661 116.5 -1.88 -1.96 0.844 47.1% 0 — — 30.4% -1.13 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.65 2018 1678 127.0 -0.16 -1.20 0.969 49.4% -91 — +171 43.3% -0.25 3–4 (43%) 4–6 (40%) — +1.00
31 2015 1654 122.8 +0.37 -2.07 0.944 49.7% -77 — +184 52.8% -0.14 4–3 (57%) 8–3 (73%) — +0.64 2019 1579 109.6 -3.16 -1.14 0.753 46.3% -3 — — 25.0% -1.63 — — — +0.11
32 2016 1617 133.1 -0.28 -2.91 0.934 49.1% +29 -87 +110 40.3% -0.65 3–4 (43%) 12–5 (71%) — +0.66 2020 1514 93.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 1583 110.5 +0.38 -1.49 0.939 48.0% — -27 — 44.4% -0.78 1–0 2–0 — +0.44 2021 1497 101.4 +0.23 -1.99 1.032 50.8% — — — 40.0% +0.40 1–0 0–2 — +0.09
34 2018 1563 95.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1445 93.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 1551 95.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1748 123.1 -0.63 -2.79 0.869 47.8% -13 -67 +107 41.7% -0.67 18–26 (41%) 44–31 (59%) 104.5 +4.17 — 1838 133.0 -0.96 -1.44 0.886 48.0% -14 -189 +77 39.8% -0.70 28–36 (44%) 46–49 (48%) 97.9 -0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.