H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Rajeev Ram vs Michal Przysiezny H2H: 0-1

Michal Przysiezny holds a 1–0 lead over Rajeev Ram in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michal Przysiezny leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Michal Przysiezny won the 2013 Newport round of 16 2-6 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rajeev Ram
USA Age 42 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Michal Przysiezny
POL Age 42 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Michal Przysiezny #176 6-4 6-3 Rajeev Ram #97 Match data Oct 11, 2015 Q1 Q Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Michal Przysiezny #113 2-6 7-5 6-3 Rajeev Ram #86 Match data Jul 12, 2013* R16 Newport ATP 250 Grass
Michal Przysiezny #411 7-6(3) 7-6(7) Rajeev Ram #278 Match data Jun 23, 2008 Q1 Q Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

2 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rajeev Ram #1,076 #56 826 1,747 57 94 37.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Michal Przysiezny #1,346 #57 810 1,783 19 59 24.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rajeev Ram Michal Przysiezny
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2003 1–1 50.0% — 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2004 1–3 25.0% #297 1,474 0 0 2004 0–2 0.0% #339 1,478 0 0
21 2005 2–2 50.0% #195 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2006 0–1 0.0% #197 1,457 0 0 2006 2–2 50.0% #257 1,506 0 0
23 2007 0–1 0.0% #253 1,417 0 0 2007 1–3 25.0% #256 1,540 0 0
24 2008 2–4 33.3% #190 1,478 0 0 2008 0–3 0.0% #609 1,513 0 0
25 2009 8–6 57.1% #79 1,587 0 1 2009 0–1 0.0% #183 1,516 0 0
26 2010 6–18 25.0% #184 1,591 0 1 2010 1–12 7.7% #86 1,430 0 0
27 2011 2–3 40.0% #149 1,606 0 1 2011 1–4 20.0% #306 1,440 0 0
28 2012 7–9 43.8% #132 1,636 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2013 4–11 26.7% #127 1,646 0 1 2013 10–11 47.6% #66 1,775 0 0
30 2014 3–7 30.0% #139 1,660 0 1 2014 4–18 18.2% #174 1,660 0 0
31 2015 7–6 53.8% #89 1,654 0 2 2015 0–2 0.0% #193 1,667 0 0
32 2016 12–19 38.7% #129 1,616 0 2 2016 0–1 0.0% #428 1,656 0 0
33 2017 2–2 50.0% #353 1,582 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rajeev Ram Michal Przysiezny
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 2005 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
24 2008 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
25 2009 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3% 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2010 4 12 16 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2010 0 6 6 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 2011 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2012 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 2013 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 2014 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2014 4 11 15 26.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
31 2015 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 5 0 5 100.0% 2015 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2016 9 11 20 45.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 2016 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
33 2017 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 34 71 105 32.4% 4 7 11 36.4% 19 16 35 54.3% — 11 33 44 25.0% 4 18 22 18.2% 4 8 12 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 150/151 of Rajeev Ram's and 78/78 of Michal Przysiezny's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Rajeev Ram Michal Przysiezny
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2002 1/1 3.0 3.0 41.5% 55.6% 47.4% 60.0% 50.0% 50.8% 31.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 2/2 4.5 7.0 45.7% 78.9% 42.5% 55.0% 52.8% 59.1% 39.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 4/4 4.8 5.0 54.3% 75.1% 44.7% 56.9% 44.6% 61.5% 28.2% 2004 2/2 2.0 1.5 57.9% 68.1% 40.4% 47.8% 65.0% 56.8% 33.7%
21 2005 4/4 11.3 3.8 54.9% 75.5% 45.8% 56.4% 54.3% 62.1% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 1/1 2.0 1.0 68.9% 74.5% 34.8% 0.0% 100.0% 62.2% 26.5% 2006 4/4 2.0 2.0 56.7% 61.0% 53.4% 47.7% 33.8% 57.3% 42.3%
23 2007 1/1 6.0 4.0 59.0% 71.4% 52.9% 55.6% 33.3% 63.9% 41.8% 2007 4/4 6.8 4.8 59.0% 68.4% 40.8% 60.0% 34.4% 56.7% 36.4%
24 2008 6/6 6.0 1.5 63.5% 69.6% 41.8% 45.8% 44.2% 59.3% 32.5% 2008 3/3 5.0 3.0 57.2% 63.7% 44.9% 52.2% 9.5% 55.6% 28.6%
25 2009 14/14 9.1 2.6 58.3% 77.3% 53.3% 73.2% 36.0% 67.3% 33.0% 2009 1/1 9.0 1.0 59.4% 71.9% 56.4% 57.1% 66.7% 65.6% 27.8%
26 2010 24/24 10.2 3.3 58.5% 71.2% 47.0% 42.4% 32.4% 61.1% 28.1% 2010 13/13 7.8 4.9 55.7% 72.2% 44.7% 54.0% 43.2% 60.4% 27.7%
27 2011 5/5 4.2 2.0 62.1% 70.2% 44.7% 44.7% 54.2% 61.1% 30.3% 2011 5/5 6.8 2.8 54.2% 71.1% 53.3% 49.0% 35.0% 63.1% 35.6%
28 2012 16/16 5.1 2.5 58.3% 74.9% 48.0% 58.8% 40.8% 63.4% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 15/15 7.4 2.6 61.6% 69.7% 46.1% 58.8% 39.6% 60.8% 33.6% 2013 21/21 8.5 3.2 59.7% 76.4% 50.5% 60.5% 45.2% 65.7% 31.2%
30 2014 10/10 6.1 2.8 62.0% 70.2% 48.9% 62.0% 32.6% 62.2% 31.9% 2014 22/22 8.3 3.8 60.0% 70.5% 47.5% 54.6% 36.5% 61.3% 31.4%
31 2015 13/13 9.8 2.4 63.0% 75.6% 53.0% 65.0% 44.1% 67.1% 31.1% 2015 2/2 6.5 4.0 52.0% 73.6% 44.1% 47.9% 15.0% 59.2% 29.5%
32 2016 30/31 7.2 3.0 63.5% 72.6% 50.5% 60.9% 35.2% 64.4% 33.3% 2016 1/1 2.0 6.0 48.8% 79.5% 43.9% 75.0% 33.3% 61.3% 29.0%
33 2017 4/4 6.8 4.3 55.8% 74.6% 53.0% 69.8% 22.4% 65.2% 32.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 150/151 7.6 2.9 60.2% 72.8% 48.6% 57.4% 38.6% 63.1% 32.0% — 78/78 7.4 3.6 58.1% 71.7% 47.9% 55.5% 39.1% 61.7% 31.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rajeev Ram Michal Przysiezny
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2001 1486 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2002 1479 99.7 +2.35 +0.19 0.641 41.8% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 1493 105.3 -0.85 +0.13 0.972 50.4% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 1474 102.9 -3.28 -0.64 0.731 44.5% +28 — — 27.3% -1.55 1–0 1–1 — +0.23 2004 1478 104.1 -0.13 -2.62 0.778 44.6% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.03
21 2005 1490 105.6 -0.27 -2.37 0.916 49.5% +13 — — 54.5% 0.00 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 1458 100.0 +0.64 -0.34 0.700 45.1% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.05 2006 1507 110.8 +0.85 -1.37 0.993 50.1% — +39 — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 1–0 — -0.09
23 2007 1418 101.5 -4.12 -2.14 1.157 51.3% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.10 2007 1541 111.9 -0.66 -0.96 0.841 47.0% — +24 — 33.3% -1.42 1–1 0–1 — -0.33
24 2008 1479 114.5 -1.05 -1.49 0.798 46.4% +22 — — 40.0% -0.80 0–1 3–3 (50%) — +0.19 2008 1514 102.9 -0.59 -3.68 0.644 43.1% — +58 — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.18
25 2009 1587 122.4 +1.13 -1.70 1.010 50.2% -72 — +148 52.8% +0.11 3–1 (75%) 2–4 (33%) 99.9 +0.97 2009 1517 108.0 +0.26 -4.12 0.808 47.3% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.10
26 2010 1592 116.0 -1.64 -5.51 0.722 44.9% -24 — +108 33.3% -1.42 3–6 (33%) 7–6 (54%) 101.9 +0.56 2010 1431 114.5 -2.53 -4.94 0.699 45.0% +3 +75 +146 24.2% -1.30 0–4 (0%) 1–7 (13%) 91.5 -0.12
27 2011 1606 115.8 -0.85 -2.60 0.778 45.9% +3 — — 50.0% -0.50 1–1 0–1 — +0.01 2011 1440 111.8 -1.03 -2.02 0.965 50.0% +12 — — 30.8% -0.61 0–1 1–1 — +0.44
28 2012 1636 116.2 -0.05 -3.04 0.910 48.7% -41 — +70 46.9% -0.37 0–1 4–3 (57%) — +1.50 2012 1489 104.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 1647 124.3 -1.42 -2.56 0.856 47.5% -6 — +7 40.0% -0.65 0–5 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 94.5 +0.29 2013 1776 134.8 +1.94 -2.48 0.909 49.2% -91 — -65 43.6% -0.42 5–3 (63%) 5–6 (45%) 105.3 +0.18
30 2014 1661 116.5 -1.88 -1.96 0.844 47.1% 0 — — 30.4% -1.13 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) 98.4 +0.65 2014 1660 121.7 -1.71 -4.21 0.811 46.8% +17 -131 -26 31.0% -1.26 3–6 (33%) 8–7 (53%) 97.5 +0.21
31 2015 1654 122.8 +0.37 -2.07 0.944 49.7% -77 — +184 52.8% -0.14 4–3 (57%) 8–3 (73%) 104.7 +0.64 2015 1668 119.8 -0.92 -3.23 0.723 44.6% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.07
32 2016 1617 133.1 -0.28 -2.91 0.934 49.1% +29 -87 +110 40.3% -0.65 3–4 (43%) 12–5 (71%) 105.8 +0.66 2016 1656 105.5 -4.72 -0.33 0.748 46.3% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.02
33 2017 1583 110.5 +0.38 -1.49 0.939 48.0% — -27 — 44.4% -0.78 1–0 2–0 — +0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2018 1563 95.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1633 98.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 1551 95.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1748 123.1 -0.63 -2.79 0.869 47.8% -13 -67 +107 41.7% -0.67 18–26 (41%) 44–31 (59%) 104.5 +4.17 — 1783 122.9 -0.54 -3.28 0.825 47.3% -24 +10 +3 31.8% -1.04 9–18 (33%) 16–24 (40%) 93.1 +0.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.