H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Rajeev Ram vs Michal Przysiezny H2H: 0-1
Michal Przysiezny holds a 1–0 lead over Rajeev Ram in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michal Przysiezny leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Michal Przysiezny won the 2013 Newport fourth round 2-6 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 42
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2015 | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Michal Przysiezny | 6-4 6-3 | Rajeev Ram | Match data |
| Jul 12, 2013* | Newport | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Michal Przysiezny | 2-6 7-5 6-3 | Rajeev Ram | Match data |
| Jun 23, 2008 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Q1 | Grass | Michal Przysiezny | 7-6(3) 7-6(7) | Rajeev Ram | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rajeev Ram | #1,076 | #56 | 826 | 1,747 | 57 | 94 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Michal Przysiezny | #1,345 | #57 | 810 | 1,784 | 19 | 58 | 24.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Rajeev Ram | Michal Przysiezny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #536 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #437 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #257 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #297 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #256 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #195 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,417 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #86 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #190 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #306 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #79 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #184 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #174 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #149 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #132 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #428 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #127 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #139 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #89 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #129 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #353 | 1,582 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |