H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Rajeev Ram vs Thiemo de Bakker H2H: 0-2

Thiemo de Bakker holds a 2–0 lead over Rajeev Ram in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Thiemo de Bakker leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thiemo de Bakker won the 2010 Miami Open first round 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rajeev Ram
USA Age 42 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Thiemo de Bakker
NED Age 37 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Thiemo de Bakker #76 6-4 7-5 Rajeev Ram #80 Match data Mar 26, 2010* R128 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Thiemo de Bakker #96 6-1 6-1 Rajeev Ram #79 Match data Jan 7, 2010* R32 Chennai ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rajeev Ram #1,076 #56 826 1,747 57 94 37.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Thiemo de Bakker #1,382 #40 1,010 1,853 54 80 40.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rajeev Ram Thiemo de Bakker
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2006 1–1 50.0% #464 1,512 0 0
18 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,479 0 0 2007 1–4 20.0% #444 1,502 0 0
19 2003 1–1 50.0% — 1,492 0 0 2008 1–1 50.0% #249 1,531 0 0
20 2004 1–3 25.0% #297 1,474 0 0 2009 2–3 40.0% #96 1,612 0 0
21 2005 2–2 50.0% #195 1,490 0 0 2010 26–23 53.1% #43 1,763 0 0
22 2006 0–1 0.0% #197 1,457 0 0 2011 2–11 15.4% #223 1,665 0 0
23 2007 0–1 0.0% #253 1,417 0 0 2012 0–2 0.0% #124 1,642 0 0
24 2008 2–4 33.3% #190 1,478 0 0 2013 7–10 41.2% #146 1,683 0 0
25 2009 8–6 57.1% #79 1,587 0 1 2014 7–6 53.8% #144 1,665 0 0
26 2010 6–18 25.0% #184 1,591 0 1 2015 2–5 28.6% #99 1,617 0 0
27 2011 2–3 40.0% #149 1,606 0 1 2016 5–12 29.4% #257 1,582 0 0
28 2012 7–9 43.8% #132 1,636 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2013 4–11 26.7% #127 1,646 0 1 2018 0–1 0.0% #242 1,558 0 0
30 2014 3–7 30.0% #139 1,660 0 1 2019 0–1 0.0% #511 1,536 0 0
31 2015 7–6 53.8% #89 1,654 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2016 12–19 38.7% #129 1,616 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2017 2–2 50.0% #353 1,582 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rajeev Ram Thiemo de Bakker
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 2003 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 2004 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2005 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 16 16 32 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 1 6 7 14.3% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — —
23 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2008 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2013 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 2009 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3% 2014 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
26 2010 4 12 16 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
27 2011 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — —
28 2012 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 2018 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2014 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2019 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2015 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 5 0 5 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 9 11 20 45.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 34 71 105 32.4% 4 7 11 36.4% 19 16 35 54.3% — 27 45 72 37.5% 20 24 44 45.5% 7 11 18 38.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 150/151 of Rajeev Ram's and 133/134 of Thiemo de Bakker's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Rajeev Ram Thiemo de Bakker
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 2/2 3.5 3.0 54.6% 74.1% 49.1% 72.9% 41.7% 62.8% 39.2%
18 2002 1/1 3.0 3.0 41.5% 55.6% 47.4% 60.0% 50.0% 50.8% 31.6% 2007 5/5 8.2 1.2 65.7% 71.8% 58.9% 57.1% 49.6% 67.3% 25.6%
19 2003 2/2 4.5 7.0 45.7% 78.9% 42.5% 55.0% 52.8% 59.1% 39.8% 2008 2/2 7.5 1.0 55.0% 73.1% 56.3% 68.6% 31.3% 66.0% 34.0%
20 2004 4/4 4.8 5.0 54.3% 75.1% 44.7% 56.9% 44.6% 61.5% 28.2% 2009 5/5 5.8 1.4 62.2% 70.1% 51.0% 61.2% 36.1% 62.1% 36.0%
21 2005 4/4 11.3 3.8 54.9% 75.5% 45.8% 56.4% 54.3% 62.1% 34.7% 2010 49/49 9.8 1.6 61.0% 73.7% 53.5% 60.8% 41.7% 65.8% 35.9%
22 2006 1/1 2.0 1.0 68.9% 74.5% 34.8% 0.0% 100.0% 62.2% 26.5% 2011 13/13 6.5 2.8 54.5% 68.0% 48.7% 53.9% 21.4% 59.2% 28.0%
23 2007 1/1 6.0 4.0 59.0% 71.4% 52.9% 55.6% 33.3% 63.9% 41.8% 2012 2/2 5.0 1.0 55.3% 60.2% 42.0% 48.5% 100.0% 52.1% 28.9%
24 2008 6/6 6.0 1.5 63.5% 69.6% 41.8% 45.8% 44.2% 59.3% 32.5% 2013 17/17 6.2 2.0 60.6% 69.6% 45.6% 62.0% 41.5% 60.2% 34.7%
25 2009 14/14 9.1 2.6 58.3% 77.3% 53.3% 73.2% 36.0% 67.3% 33.0% 2014 12/13 8.7 2.2 57.1% 77.0% 47.1% 64.2% 26.3% 64.1% 33.6%
26 2010 24/24 10.2 3.3 58.5% 71.2% 47.0% 42.4% 32.4% 61.1% 28.1% 2015 7/7 9.0 2.0 54.3% 74.6% 49.2% 59.1% 37.8% 63.0% 34.9%
27 2011 5/5 4.2 2.0 62.1% 70.2% 44.7% 44.7% 54.2% 61.1% 30.3% 2016 17/17 7.2 1.5 60.3% 70.5% 47.1% 49.0% 36.1% 61.3% 33.8%
28 2012 16/16 5.1 2.5 58.3% 74.9% 48.0% 58.8% 40.8% 63.4% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 15/15 7.4 2.6 61.6% 69.7% 46.1% 58.8% 39.6% 60.8% 33.6% 2018 1/1 4.0 3.0 71.7% 60.6% 15.4% 33.3% — 47.8% 15.8%
30 2014 10/10 6.1 2.8 62.0% 70.2% 48.9% 62.0% 32.6% 62.2% 31.9% 2019 1/1 9.0 4.0 58.2% 68.8% 17.4% 69.2% — 47.3% 21.4%
31 2015 13/13 9.8 2.4 63.0% 75.6% 53.0% 65.0% 44.1% 67.1% 31.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 30/31 7.2 3.0 63.5% 72.6% 50.5% 60.9% 35.2% 64.4% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 4/4 6.8 4.3 55.8% 74.6% 53.0% 69.8% 22.4% 65.2% 32.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 150/151 7.6 2.9 60.2% 72.8% 48.6% 57.4% 38.6% 63.1% 32.0% — 133/134 8.1 1.8 59.5% 72.0% 49.7% 58.8% 37.6% 63.0% 33.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rajeev Ram Thiemo de Bakker
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2001 1486 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1513 104.7 -0.21 +0.15 1.055 51.5% — — — 60.0% +0.20 0–1 — — -0.08
18 2002 1479 99.7 +2.35 +0.19 0.641 41.8% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.13 2007 1502 115.2 -0.81 -3.06 0.782 47.1% — — — 35.7% -0.79 0–2 4–3 (57%) — -0.08
19 2003 1493 105.3 -0.85 +0.13 0.972 50.4% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.02 2008 1532 107.0 -0.17 -0.92 1.000 50.8% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 0–1 — +0.11
20 2004 1474 102.9 -3.28 -0.64 0.731 44.5% +28 — — 27.3% -1.55 1–0 1–1 — +0.23 2009 1612 119.7 +1.05 -2.08 0.949 49.0% — — — 41.7% -0.58 1–1 2–2 (50%) — 0.00
21 2005 1490 105.6 -0.27 -2.37 0.916 49.5% +13 — — 54.5% 0.00 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.22 2010 1764 149.9 +1.79 +0.33 1.050 50.7% -70 +14 -122 50.8% +0.25 7–5 (58%) 11–16 (41%) — +0.27
22 2006 1458 100.0 +0.64 -0.34 0.700 45.1% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.05 2011 1665 125.5 -1.60 -4.74 0.686 44.4% -43 +82 — 27.0% -1.97 2–4 (33%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.54
23 2007 1418 101.5 -4.12 -2.14 1.157 51.3% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.10 2012 1642 103.3 -3.01 -3.23 0.604 41.7% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — 0–1 — -0.03
24 2008 1479 114.5 -1.05 -1.49 0.798 46.4% +22 — — 40.0% -0.80 0–1 3–3 (50%) — +0.19 2013 1684 129.6 -1.39 -1.41 0.871 47.6% -45 +78 -77 37.8% -0.81 2–1 (67%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.74
25 2009 1587 122.4 +1.13 -1.70 1.010 50.2% -72 — +148 52.8% +0.11 3–1 (75%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.97 2014 1665 127.0 +0.17 -1.17 0.935 48.9% +12 — — 48.1% -0.19 2–1 (67%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.61
26 2010 1592 116.0 -1.64 -5.51 0.722 44.9% -24 — +108 33.3% -1.42 3–6 (33%) 7–6 (54%) — +0.56 2015 1618 116.8 +1.14 -1.79 0.944 49.0% — +111 — 41.2% -0.17 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.19
27 2011 1606 115.8 -0.85 -2.60 0.778 45.9% +3 — — 50.0% -0.50 1–1 0–1 — +0.01 2016 1583 124.7 -1.66 -1.23 0.874 47.5% +82 +70 — 34.9% -1.05 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.71
28 2012 1636 116.2 -0.05 -3.04 0.910 48.7% -41 — +70 46.9% -0.37 0–1 4–3 (57%) — +1.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 1647 124.3 -1.42 -2.56 0.856 47.5% -6 — +7 40.0% -0.65 0–5 (0%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.29 2018 1558 101.5 -1.76 -3.04 0.303 33.3% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06
30 2014 1661 116.5 -1.88 -1.96 0.844 47.1% 0 — — 30.4% -1.13 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.65 2019 1536 99.8 +0.16 -1.51 0.406 36.1% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.04
31 2015 1654 122.8 +0.37 -2.07 0.944 49.7% -77 — +184 52.8% -0.14 4–3 (57%) 8–3 (73%) — +0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 1617 133.1 -0.28 -2.91 0.934 49.1% +29 -87 +110 40.3% -0.65 3–4 (43%) 12–5 (71%) — +0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 1583 110.5 +0.38 -1.49 0.939 48.0% — -27 — 44.4% -0.78 1–0 2–0 — +0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2018 1563 95.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 1551 95.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1748 123.1 -0.63 -2.79 0.869 47.8% -13 -67 +107 41.7% -0.67 18–26 (41%) 44–31 (59%) 104.5 +4.17 — 1854 134.5 +0.13 -1.17 0.910 48.5% -29 +62 -104 41.6% -0.54 18–21 (46%) 33–36 (48%) 101.5 -0.74

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.