H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Ramiro Benavides vs Zeljko Franulovic H2H: 0-1
Zeljko Franulovic holds a 1–0 lead over Ramiro Benavides in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Zeljko Franulovic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Zeljko Franulovic won the 1970 Cincinnati second round 1-6 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BOL
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 1970* | Cincinnati | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Zeljko Franulovic | 1-6 6-1 6-4 | Ramiro Benavides | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ramiro Benavides | #1,003 | #124 | 0 | 1,563 | 44 | 108 | 28.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Zeljko Franulovic | #616 | #30 | 0 | 2,014 | 407 | 307 | 57.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ramiro Benavides | Zeljko Franulovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 47–20 | 70.1% | — | 1,864 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1970 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 64–29 | 68.8% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 59–28 | 67.8% | — | 1,921 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #70 | 1,706 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 1974 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #210 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #77 | 1,657 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | 1975 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #153 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #68 | 1,747 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 1976 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #44 | 1,916 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 1977 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #164 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #42 | 1,762 | 0 | 13 |
| 31 | 1978 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #180 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #38 | 1,800 | 0 | 13 |
| 32 | 1979 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #149 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #97 | 1,768 | 0 | 13 |
| 33 | 1980 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #173 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #86 | 1,678 | 0 | 13 |
| 34 | 1981 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #173 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #100 | 1,648 | 0 | 13 |
| 35 | 1982 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #221 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,616 | 0 | 13 |
| 36 | 1983 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,567 | 0 | 13 |