H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Ramon Delgado vs Takao Suzuki H2H: 1-0

Ramon Delgado holds a 1–0 lead over Takao Suzuki in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ramon Delgado leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ramon Delgado won the 1999 Memphis round of 32 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ramon Delgado
PAR Age 49 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Takao Suzuki
JPN Age 49 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Takao Suzuki #283 3-6 7-6(4) 6-4 Ramon Delgado #184 Match data Jan 19, 2010* Q2 Q Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Ramon Delgado #164 6-3 4-6 7-5 Takao Suzuki #161 Match data May 23, 2005 Q1 Q Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Ramon Delgado #158 7-6(1) 7-6(1) Takao Suzuki #229 Match data Aug 26, 2003* Q3 Q US Open Grand Slam Hard
Ramon Delgado #56 6-3 6-2 Takao Suzuki #116 Match data Feb 18, 1999* R32 Memphis ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

3 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ramon Delgado #518 #52 829 1,712 69 102 40.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Takao Suzuki #1,016 #102 470 1,669 23 34 40.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ramon Delgado Takao Suzuki
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1995 0–2 0.0% #487 1,473 0 0
19 1996 2–2 50.0% #289 1,513 0 0 1996 1–1 50.0% #517 1,493 0 0
20 1997 2–6 25.0% #114 1,500 0 0 1997 1–1 50.0% #272 1,506 0 0
21 1998 22–22 50.0% #56 1,680 0 0 1998 2–2 50.0% #115 1,544 0 0
22 1999 11–21 34.4% #149 1,560 0 0 1999 1–9 10.0% #262 1,462 0 0
23 2000 3–1 75.0% #257 1,587 0 0 2000 1–1 50.0% #160 1,477 0 0
24 2001 8–7 53.3% #92 1,641 0 0 2001 3–2 60.0% #225 1,516 0 0
25 2002 8–20 28.6% #123 1,602 0 0 2002 2–4 33.3% #136 1,506 0 0
26 2003 4–6 40.0% #200 1,662 0 0 2003 4–3 57.1% #205 1,609 0 0
27 2004 0–1 0.0% #227 1,622 0 0 2004 2–3 40.0% #212 1,610 0 0
28 2005 2–2 50.0% #131 1,610 0 0 2005 1–2 33.3% #272 1,588 0 0
29 2006 6–9 40.0% #156 1,572 0 0 2006 3–1 75.0% #471 1,619 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2007 0–1 0.0% #241 1,543 0 0
31 2008 0–2 0.0% #264 1,575 0 0 2008 2–1 66.7% #509 1,543 0 0
32 2009 0–1 0.0% #203 1,570 0 0 2009 0–1 0.0% #282 1,541 0 0
33 2010 1–2 33.3% #194 1,558 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ramon Delgado Takao Suzuki
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1997 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 8 11 19 42.1% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1998 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1999 9 12 21 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
23 2000 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2001 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2002 7 13 20 35.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2002 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2003 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
27 2004 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2005 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2006 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 43 64 107 40.2% 21 26 47 44.7% 2 9 11 18.2% 3 3 6 50.0% — 22 29 51 43.1% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 147/171 of Ramon Delgado's and 24/24 of Takao Suzuki's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ramon Delgado Takao Suzuki
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1996 4/4 3.5 3.3 63.2% 68.9% 47.4% 49.8% 44.3% 61.1% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 6/8 5.2 2.7 65.0% 64.0% 55.7% 56.5% 42.4% 60.2% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 37/44 9.3 3.6 55.3% 72.4% 48.7% 54.0% 41.8% 61.9% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1999 25/32 5.6 2.8 59.5% 65.6% 46.0% 55.4% 36.5% 57.7% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2000 3/4 5.3 0.3 58.6% 64.2% 60.2% 29.2% 61.5% 62.7% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2001 12/15 8.0 2.6 60.8% 69.6% 49.0% 38.2% 40.9% 61.4% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2002 24/28 4.5 3.5 60.8% 64.3% 44.7% 50.9% 33.0% 56.4% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2003 10/10 5.5 3.4 66.0% 67.0% 50.9% 67.0% 50.4% 61.6% 33.2% 2003 7/7 7.7 3.1 58.1% 73.1% 52.8% 74.9% 39.7% 65.0% 34.3%
27 2004 1/1 3.0 2.0 73.1% 68.4% 28.6% 33.3% 0.0% 57.7% 30.9% 2004 5/5 11.8 3.8 62.6% 75.8% 48.5% 49.7% 52.6% 65.6% 32.4%
28 2005 4/4 3.0 2.0 62.2% 67.6% 48.9% 54.0% 36.3% 60.6% 44.3% 2005 3/3 10.3 2.7 64.5% 73.2% 58.4% 82.3% 63.9% 67.6% 29.6%
29 2006 15/15 6.3 2.7 58.0% 69.5% 51.9% 54.4% 50.3% 62.1% 33.1% 2006 4/4 12.8 2.5 62.7% 80.9% 66.7% 87.5% 50.0% 75.5% 29.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 1/1 12.0 4.0 54.3% 76.5% 60.5% 50.0% 14.3% 69.1% 32.4%
31 2008 2/2 5.0 3.5 51.9% 70.2% 36.4% 40.0% 83.3% 54.2% 29.6% 2008 3/3 12.0 2.3 60.0% 77.6% 50.9% 68.4% 44.4% 66.4% 33.0%
32 2009 1/1 5.0 1.0 64.6% 81.0% 39.1% 0.0% 100.0% 66.2% 33.3% 2009 1/1 4.0 2.0 60.9% 57.1% 72.2% 0.0% 0.0% 63.0% 26.7%
33 2010 3/3 6.7 0.7 69.1% 64.1% 52.8% 70.4% 36.7% 60.7% 35.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 147/171 6.4 3.0 59.7% 68.1% 48.3% 52.5% 41.8% 60.0% 36.0% — 24/57 10.3 3.0 60.8% 75.0% 55.8% 67.7% 45.0% 67.5% 31.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ramon Delgado Takao Suzuki
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1473 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.09
19 1996 1513 115.7 +0.70 -0.17 1.086 51.9% — +56 — 50.0% +0.20 0–1 1–1 — +0.22 1996 1493 109.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.16
20 1997 1500 116.1 -0.56 -0.42 0.995 49.9% — +75 — 33.3% -0.71 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.12 1997 1507 105.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.04
21 1998 1681 139.7 +0.37 -0.42 0.954 49.4% -71 +35 — 46.7% -0.08 9–7 (56%) 9–14 (39%) — +0.21 1998 1545 118.3 — — — — +30 — — 44.4% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — -0.29
22 1999 1561 121.5 -3.27 -2.37 0.824 46.7% +50 +39 -22 35.9% -1.18 6–4 (60%) 7–3 (70%) — +1.00 1999 1462 115.1 — — — — +53 — — 30.0% -1.20 0–4 (0%) 1–6 (14%) — -0.13
23 2000 1587 103.5 -0.31 +0.23 1.155 52.2% — +29 — 66.7% +0.67 1–0 — — +0.17 2000 1477 103.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.83 1–1 — — +0.17
24 2001 1641 116.1 -0.50 -2.44 0.895 48.0% +17 — — 46.2% -0.21 4–0 (100%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.93 2001 1517 105.7 — — — — +20 — — 50.0% -0.21 2–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.26
25 2002 1602 121.6 -3.69 -0.34 0.844 46.9% +33 -41 — 33.8% -1.10 4–6 (40%) 5–7 (42%) — -0.61 2002 1506 104.2 — — — — +14 — — 35.7% -0.93 1–1 1–1 — +0.27
26 2003 1663 121.6 -0.52 -1.48 0.863 48.1% +24 — — 40.7% -0.59 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.37 2003 1609 114.1 -2.01 -0.21 0.982 49.9% -33 — — 56.3% -0.13 — 4–1 (80%) — +0.23
27 2004 1623 108.3 +0.13 +0.03 0.729 43.0% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.13 2004 1611 113.5 +1.14 -2.01 0.942 49.1% +12 — — 42.9% -0.86 1–1 4–2 (67%) — -0.08
28 2005 1611 108.0 -0.79 +1.21 1.124 52.0% +14 — — 44.4% +0.44 1–0 0–1 — +0.60 2005 1588 114.1 -0.19 +2.68 0.913 49.3% +55 — — 44.4% +0.22 0–1 0–1 — -0.25
29 2006 1572 116.8 -0.18 -2.08 0.873 48.0% +15 — — 34.4% -1.19 2–2 (50%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.31 2006 1619 124.5 +2.96 -0.08 1.193 53.1% +51 — — 63.6% +1.28 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.05
30 2007 1527 96.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1544 100.8 -3.25 +0.61 1.049 50.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — -0.05
31 2008 1575 112.4 -1.62 +1.72 0.648 42.2% — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 0–1 — -0.18 2008 1543 102.7 +1.12 -0.43 0.981 50.2% +54 — — 62.5% -0.13 1–1 3–0 (100%) — +0.15
32 2009 1571 109.4 -5.13 +4.37 0.985 48.3% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.08 2009 1541 112.1 +2.43 +1.00 0.722 42.5% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.10
33 2010 1559 110.1 -0.79 -0.53 0.897 48.4% — — — 33.3% -0.67 1–0 0–1 — -0.09 2010 1546 106.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1528 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1512 99.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1508 95.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1713 126.5 -1.26 -1.02 0.899 48.2% +7 +32 -22 39.7% -0.65 30–26 (54%) 29–40 (42%) 105.5 +0.96 — 1669 118.5 +0.23 -0.15 0.981 49.9% +27 — — 43.2% -0.56 9–11 (45%) 18–15 (55%) 105.7 +0.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.