H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Ray Ruffels vs Nikola Pilic H2H: 4-4

Ray Ruffels and Nikola Pilic are tied 4–4 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Ray Ruffels leads 2–1 on grass, while Nikola Pilic leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Ray Ruffels won the 1972 Cleveland Wct quarterfinal 3-6 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ray Ruffels
AUS Age 80 Right-Handed
H2H
4 – 4
8 main draw meetings
Nikola Pilic
CRO Left-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 18, 1972* Cleveland Wct ATP 250 QF Hard Ray Ruffels 3-6 6-3 7-5 Nikola Pilic Match data
Apr 26, 1972* Charlotte Wct ATP 250 R32 Clay Nikola Pilic 6-3 6-3 Ray Ruffels Match data
Oct 13, 1971* Vancouver Wct ATP 250 R32 Carpet Nikola Pilic 6-3 6-2 Ray Ruffels Match data
May 5, 1971* Rome Masters 1000 R64 Clay Nikola Pilic 7-6 6-4 Ray Ruffels Match data
Nov 4, 1970* Stockholm Open ATP 250 R32 Hard Ray Ruffels 13-11 3-6 6-4 Nikola Pilic Match data
Jan 31, 1970* Auckland ATP 250 QF Grass Ray Ruffels 6-4 0-6 6-4 2-6 6-4 Nikola Pilic Match data
Jan 28, 1970* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Grass Ray Ruffels 7-5 6-4 5-7 7-5 Nikola Pilic Match data
Jul 12, 1969* Dublin ATP 250 QF Grass Nikola Pilic 2-6 8-6 6-3 Ray Ruffels Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ray Ruffels #482 #27 0 1,903 246 207 54.3% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Nikola Pilic #284 #12 0 1,953 301 248 54.8% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ray Ruffels Nikola Pilic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
22 1968 41–19 68.3% — 1,718 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 1969 35–21 62.5% — 1,760 0 2 — — — — — — —
24 1970 35–22 61.4% — 1,781 0 3 — — — — — — —
25 1971 32–32 50.0% — 1,808 0 3 — — — — — — —
26 1972 19–22 46.3% — 1,785 0 4 — — — — — — —
27 1973 1–1 50.0% #141 1,773 0 4 — — — — — — —
28 1974 17–19 47.2% #76 1,760 0 4 1968 42–46 47.7% — 1,638 0 1
29 1975 16–23 41.0% #112 1,692 0 4 1969 27–24 52.9% — 1,767 0 2
30 1976 34–20 63.0% #27 1,782 0 5 1970 47–31 60.3% — 1,891 0 3
31 1977 12–17 41.4% #96 1,699 0 5 1971 39–31 55.7% — 1,836 0 4
32 1978 3–6 33.3% #279 1,617 0 5 1972 34–28 54.8% — 1,894 0 5
33 1979 0–4 0.0% #480 1,544 0 5 1973 44–27 62.0% #15 1,840 0 5
34 1980 1–1 50.0% #482 1,539 0 5 1974 22–12 64.7% #32 1,898 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 1975 20–15 57.1% #50 1,857 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 1976 13–14 48.1% #68 1,743 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 1977 11–13 45.8% #91 1,701 0 6
38 — — — — — — — 1978 2–7 22.2% #284 1,622 0 6