H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Reilly Opelka vs Botic van de Zandschulp H2H: 1-1
Reilly Opelka and Botic van de Zandschulp are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Reilly Opelka won the 2025 Swiss Indoors Basel fourth round 7-6 6-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 28
Right-Handed
211 cm / 6'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Netherlands
Age 30
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2025* | Swiss Indoors Basel | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Reilly Opelka | 7-6 6-7 6-3 | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data |
| Oct 20, 2025* | Swiss Indoors Basel | ATP 500 | Q2 | Hard | Reilly Opelka | 6-4 6-4 | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data |
| Feb 5, 2021* | Great Ocean Road Open | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Botic van de Zandschulp | 7-6(6) 7-6(4) | Reilly Opelka | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reilly Opelka | #131 | #17 | 2,475 | 1,973 | 124 | 119 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #55 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,932 | 114 | 118 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Reilly Opelka | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #204 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #229 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #36 | 1,850 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2020 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #39 | 1,849 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2021 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,862 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2022 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #38 | 1,820 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #293 | 1,712 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #52 | 1,754 | 0 | 4 | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2026 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,717 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |