H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Reilly Opelka vs Mitchell Krueger H2H: 1-0
Reilly Opelka holds a 1–0 lead over Mitchell Krueger in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Reilly Opelka leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Reilly Opelka won the 2022 Houston fourth round 3-6 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 28
Right-Handed
211 cm / 6'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
United States
Age 32
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2022* | Houston | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Reilly Opelka | 3-6 6-2 6-4 | Mitchell Krueger | Match data |
| Jul 2, 2018 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Q1 | Grass | Reilly Opelka | 5-7 6-3 6-4 | Mitchell Krueger | Match data |
| Jan 17, 2017* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Q2 | Hard | Reilly Opelka | 6-3 7-6(2) | Mitchell Krueger | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reilly Opelka | #131 | #17 | 2,475 | 1,973 | 124 | 119 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Mitchell Krueger | #364 | #135 | 462 | 1,688 | 11 | 25 | 30.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Reilly Opelka | Mitchell Krueger | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #204 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #229 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #362 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #36 | 1,850 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2020 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #39 | 1,849 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2021 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,862 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #191 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #38 | 1,820 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #228 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #293 | 1,712 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #192 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #52 | 1,754 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2026 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,717 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #214 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #283 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #206 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |