H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Reilly Opelka vs Nick Kyrgios H2H: 2-1
Reilly Opelka holds a 2–1 lead over Nick Kyrgios in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Reilly Opelka leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nick Kyrgios won the 2022 Washington fourth round 7-6(1) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 28
Right-Handed
211 cm / 6'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
Australia
Age 31
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2022* | Washington | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Nick Kyrgios | 7-6(1) 6-2 | Reilly Opelka | Match data |
| Apr 9, 2022* | Houston | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Reilly Opelka | 6-3 7-5 | Nick Kyrgios | Match data |
| Aug 11, 2021* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Reilly Opelka | 4-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | Nick Kyrgios | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reilly Opelka | #131 | #17 | 2,475 | 1,973 | 124 | 119 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Nick Kyrgios | #670 | #13 | 2,460 | 2,153 | 197 | 115 | 63.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Reilly Opelka | Nick Kyrgios | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #204 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #229 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #52 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #30 | 1,935 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #36 | 1,850 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 39–15 | 72.2% | #13 | 2,058 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2020 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #39 | 1,849 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,986 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2021 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,862 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #35 | 1,965 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2022 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #38 | 1,820 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,935 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #45 | 1,951 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2024 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #293 | 1,712 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,878 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2025 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #52 | 1,754 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 40–12 | 76.9% | #22 | 2,096 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2026 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,717 | 0 | 4 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 2,067 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #671 | 1,969 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #670 | 1,896 | 0 | 7 |