H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Reilly Opelka vs Nicolas Jarry H2H: 1-0
Reilly Opelka holds a 1–0 lead over Nicolas Jarry in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Reilly Opelka leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Reilly Opelka won the 2025 Libema Open fourth round 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 28
Right-Handed
211 cm / 6'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Chile
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2025* | Libema Open | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Reilly Opelka | 7-6 6-3 | Nicolas Jarry | Match data |
| May 29, 2017 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Q3 | Clay | Nicolas Jarry | 7-6(4) 3-6 6-3 | Reilly Opelka | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reilly Opelka | #131 | #17 | 2,475 | 1,973 | 124 | 119 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Nicolas Jarry | #211 | #16 | 2,295 | 1,942 | 110 | 117 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Reilly Opelka | Nicolas Jarry | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #204 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #229 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #372 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #330 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #36 | 1,850 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #111 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #39 | 1,849 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #43 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,862 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #77 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2022 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #38 | 1,820 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2024 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #293 | 1,712 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #152 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2025 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #52 | 1,754 | 0 | 4 | 2023 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #19 | 1,907 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2026 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,717 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #35 | 1,737 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #122 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 |