H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Renzo Furlan vs Daniel Vacek H2H: 2-2
Renzo Furlan and Daniel Vacek are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Daniel Vacek leads 2–0 on carpet, while Renzo Furlan leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniel Vacek won the 1998 St. Petersburg third round 6-3 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 1998* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Daniel Vacek | 6-3 7-6(2) | Renzo Furlan | Match data |
| Mar 8, 1997* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Daniel Vacek | 6-4 1-6 6-3 | Renzo Furlan | Match data |
| Sep 26, 1996* | Basel | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Renzo Furlan | 6-7(4) 6-3 6-2 | Daniel Vacek | Match data |
| Apr 24, 1996* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Renzo Furlan | 6-4 7-6(3) | Daniel Vacek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renzo Furlan | #1,479 | #19 | 1,235 | 1,844 | 209 | 231 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,818 | 170 | 219 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Renzo Furlan | Daniel Vacek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1989 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #222 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1990 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #77 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #52 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1992 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #53 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #72 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #41 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1995 | 37–31 | 54.4% | #29 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1996 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #40 | 1,695 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1997 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1998 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #144 | 1,514 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1999 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #225 | 1,542 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #236 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,540 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2003 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #194 | 1,548 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |