H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Renzo Furlan vs Daniel Vacek H2H: 2-2

Renzo Furlan and Daniel Vacek are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Daniel Vacek leads 2–0 on carpet, while Renzo Furlan leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniel Vacek won the 1998 St. Petersburg round of 32 6-3 7-6(2).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Renzo Furlan
ITA Age 56 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Daniel Vacek
CZE Age 55 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniel Vacek #48 6-3 7-6(2) Renzo Furlan #116 Match data Feb 12, 1998* R32 St. Petersburg ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Daniel Vacek #72 6-4 1-6 6-3 Renzo Furlan #74 Match data Mar 8, 1997* QF ABN AMRO Open World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Renzo Furlan #38 6-7(4) 6-3 6-2 Daniel Vacek #37 Match data Sep 26, 1996* R32 Swiss Indoors World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Renzo Furlan #20 6-4 7-6(3) Daniel Vacek #36 Match data Apr 24, 1996* R64 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Renzo Furlan #1,479 #19 1,235 1,864 214 233 47.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Daniel Vacek #1,133 #26 1,151 1,821 171 220 43.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Renzo Furlan Daniel Vacek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1989 3–5 37.5% #222 1,500 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1990 9–8 52.9% #77 1,597 0 0 1991 1–3 25.0% #470 1,490 0 0
21 1991 22–26 45.8% #52 1,664 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1992 26–29 47.3% #53 1,682 0 0 1993 13–22 37.1% #114 1,559 0 0
23 1993 26–28 48.1% #72 1,682 0 0 1994 25–27 48.1% #45 1,732 0 0
24 1994 30–27 52.6% #41 1,665 0 2 1995 30–31 49.2% #27 1,797 0 0
25 1995 37–31 54.4% #29 1,729 0 2 1996 23–29 44.2% #71 1,692 0 0
26 1996 32–27 54.2% #40 1,706 0 2 1997 19–26 42.2% #53 1,669 0 0
27 1997 18–27 40.0% #100 1,581 0 2 1998 25–29 46.3% #50 1,671 0 0
28 1998 2–8 20.0% #144 1,514 0 2 1999 29–31 48.3% #43 1,740 0 0
29 1999 3–5 37.5% #225 1,542 0 2 2000 4–13 23.5% #238 1,628 0 0
30 2000 3–4 42.9% #236 1,569 0 2 2001 2–7 22.2% #393 1,595 0 0
31 2001 1–1 50.0% #190 1,554 0 2 2002 0–2 0.0% #749 1,577 0 0
32 2002 1–3 25.0% #186 1,540 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2003 1–4 20.0% #194 1,547 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Renzo Furlan Daniel Vacek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1989 — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1990 — — — — 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — — — — — 1991 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1991 1 7 8 12.5% 20 17 37 54.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1992 0 7 7 0.0% 25 20 45 55.6% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1993 7 9 16 43.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
23 1993 2 6 8 25.0% 23 21 44 52.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 10 11 21 47.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 7 16 56.3%
24 1994 10 7 17 58.8% 17 16 33 51.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1995 11 11 22 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 14 10 24 58.3%
25 1995 17 10 27 63.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 1996 10 11 21 47.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
26 1996 17 13 30 56.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1997 6 11 17 35.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 10 7 17 58.8%
27 1997 4 10 14 28.6% 6 11 17 35.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1998 17 17 34 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 7 10 30.0%
28 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1999 20 17 37 54.1% 1 6 7 14.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6%
29 1999 — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — 2000 4 9 13 30.8% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2000 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2001 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
31 2001 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2002 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2003 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 55 68 123 44.7% 127 128 255 49.8% 3 6 9 33.3% 29 31 60 48.3% — 87 105 192 45.3% 22 42 64 34.4% 17 23 40 42.5% 45 50 95 47.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 351/422 of Renzo Furlan's and 346/391 of Daniel Vacek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Renzo Furlan Daniel Vacek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 4/4 3.8 2.8 61.6% 71.4% 42.5% 43.4% 19.0% 59.1% 34.1%
21 1991 43/48 1.4 1.2 62.8% 62.2% 48.8% 50.4% 49.3% 57.0% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1992 44/55 1.9 0.9 62.9% 62.7% 49.8% 53.1% 47.2% 58.0% 43.1% 1993 32/35 6.8 4.4 60.0% 72.6% 54.6% 58.6% 34.4% 65.5% 31.8%
23 1993 46/54 2.4 1.5 58.4% 66.3% 50.5% 53.8% 44.3% 59.5% 39.9% 1994 49/52 7.0 5.4 59.5% 74.6% 50.5% 56.6% 36.0% 65.1% 34.7%
24 1994 49/57 2.9 1.5 57.4% 67.6% 49.6% 48.4% 49.0% 59.8% 41.8% 1995 50/61 8.1 4.3 59.9% 75.7% 51.4% 61.3% 37.4% 65.9% 35.7%
25 1995 57/68 3.4 1.9 57.4% 69.3% 50.5% 56.3% 46.0% 61.1% 38.3% 1996 48/52 7.3 5.1 56.7% 76.2% 49.0% 53.1% 39.3% 64.6% 33.5%
26 1996 46/59 3.9 1.7 61.2% 69.4% 51.0% 57.8% 42.8% 62.2% 38.8% 1997 41/45 8.2 6.8 51.8% 76.0% 46.0% 59.0% 36.2% 61.5% 34.9%
27 1997 36/45 5.5 3.3 53.3% 74.5% 49.7% 60.0% 40.7% 62.5% 36.8% 1998 46/54 7.0 5.1 56.6% 74.9% 47.3% 61.9% 39.4% 62.8% 35.5%
28 1998 7/10 7.0 3.3 50.2% 71.6% 43.1% 58.8% 35.2% 57.1% 32.8% 1999 50/60 4.7 4.6 56.5% 70.1% 47.7% 64.0% 37.1% 60.1% 36.2%
29 1999 6/8 2.2 2.7 55.0% 60.1% 37.9% 53.7% 26.4% 50.3% 33.8% 2000 15/17 4.2 5.4 53.6% 64.8% 40.6% 42.9% 30.9% 53.9% 30.4%
30 2000 6/7 3.8 2.2 56.0% 65.0% 54.5% 66.4% 42.1% 60.2% 33.3% 2001 9/9 6.8 3.4 54.2% 67.3% 50.2% 50.6% 27.2% 59.5% 29.2%
31 2001 2/2 2.0 2.0 49.9% 73.7% 46.4% 36.7% 41.7% 60.0% 35.2% 2002 2/2 5.0 2.5 58.4% 71.8% 37.5% 45.7% 36.5% 57.6% 36.6%
32 2002 4/4 1.5 2.8 57.6% 66.1% 50.3% 50.7% 69.8% 59.3% 33.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2003 5/5 3.4 1.2 60.8% 64.4% 57.8% 49.2% 37.6% 61.8% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 351/447 3.1 1.7 58.8% 67.2% 49.8% 54.2% 45.3% 59.8% 39.7% — 346/391 6.8 5.0 57.1% 73.7% 48.8% 58.1% 36.5% 63.0% 34.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Renzo Furlan Daniel Vacek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1989 1501 106.7 — — — — — +10 — 35.0% -0.45 2–0 0–3 (0%) — +0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1990 1598 130.3 — — — — — +44 — 50.0% -0.03 3–1 (75%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.03 1991 1490 102.2 -1.04 -0.09 0.834 46.2% — — — 22.2% -1.67 — 1–0 — +0.10
21 1991 1664 137.7 -2.73 +1.94 0.994 49.8% -177 +91 — 47.1% -0.41 8–12 (40%) 12–4 (75%) — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1992 1682 140.0 -1.77 +2.85 1.025 50.4% -235 +91 — 47.4% +0.01 8–10 (44%) 3–8 (27%) — -0.67 1993 1560 126.4 +2.79 -4.51 0.922 49.1% -2 +9 -4 41.1% -0.61 3–7 (30%) 7–9 (44%) — +0.29
23 1993 1683 138.8 -0.24 +0.57 0.985 49.6% -226 +82 — 48.0% -0.09 7–8 (47%) 7–7 (50%) — +0.10 1994 1732 143.4 +3.08 -2.24 0.992 49.9% -14 -131 -90 47.5% -0.12 12–9 (57%) 13–15 (46%) — -1.41
24 1994 1665 140.9 -0.31 +2.54 1.038 50.5% -28 +39 — 48.9% +0.01 13–10 (57%) 11–9 (55%) — +0.67 1995 1798 148.9 +3.89 -1.17 1.046 50.7% +14 -171 -195 48.7% +0.03 10–11 (48%) 15–18 (45%) — -1.99
25 1995 1729 142.6 -0.32 +0.37 0.982 49.7% +21 -5 — 51.8% +0.17 14–3 (82%) 9–14 (39%) — +0.88 1996 1692 140.7 +2.32 -3.52 0.945 49.3% +10 -77 -50 45.5% -0.25 12–11 (52%) 14–11 (56%) — -2.02
26 1996 1706 139.0 +0.16 +1.18 1.029 50.3% -16 +54 -123 51.0% +0.01 14–7 (67%) 11–11 (50%) — -0.21 1997 1670 134.8 -0.60 -1.91 0.906 48.1% +38 -50 -60 41.8% -0.61 6–7 (46%) 13–12 (52%) — -0.33
27 1997 1582 130.5 +0.90 -1.60 0.981 49.4% +41 +103 — 42.6% -0.40 9–10 (47%) 14–12 (54%) — +1.02 1998 1672 143.3 +0.67 -1.11 0.956 49.4% +16 -20 -40 48.1% -0.21 6–8 (43%) 13–10 (57%) — +0.31
28 1998 1514 109.9 -1.66 -1.48 0.763 46.0% +69 +109 — 32.1% -1.21 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — +0.35 1999 1741 133.9 -1.09 -1.27 0.909 48.6% +1 -191 -65 46.2% -0.17 9–4 (69%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.89
29 1999 1542 115.4 -3.93 -1.08 0.680 42.1% — +87 — 33.3% -1.83 2–0 3–0 (100%) — -0.45 2000 1629 122.6 -4.37 -4.38 0.659 42.4% +53 -125 — 27.5% -2.08 1–2 (33%) 4–1 (80%) — -1.16
30 2000 1569 111.4 -1.39 -1.97 0.838 47.4% +18 +59 — 41.2% -0.94 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.23 2001 1595 122.1 -0.70 -2.81 0.721 45.3% +49 — — 23.8% -1.67 — 1–2 (33%) — -0.96
31 2001 1555 106.0 -2.11 +1.56 0.881 47.7% — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.18 2002 1578 111.7 +0.38 -0.21 0.865 46.5% — — — 16.7% -1.17 — 0–2 — -0.38
32 2002 1540 109.9 -1.86 -0.38 0.813 46.7% — — — 33.3% -0.56 0–1 1–1 — +0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2003 1548 103.2 -1.68 -0.29 0.984 49.5% +59 — — 10.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1865 140.8 -0.75 +0.99 0.987 49.7% -29 +67 -123 47.0% -0.18 84–67 (56%) 74–76 (49%) 104.6 +0.77 — 1822 143.7 +1.22 -2.21 0.930 48.9% +12 -96 -70 44.3% -0.37 59–59 (50%) 88–91 (49%) 102.9 -1.71

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.