H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Renzo Furlan vs Gabriel Markus H2H: 2-2
Renzo Furlan and Gabriel Markus are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Renzo Furlan leads 2–1 on clay, while Gabriel Markus leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Renzo Furlan won the 1994 Casablanca third round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 1994* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Renzo Furlan | 6-1 6-4 | Gabriel Markus | Match data |
| Nov 4, 1993* | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Renzo Furlan | 6-3 6-4 | Gabriel Markus | Match data |
| Jun 14, 1991* | Florence | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Gabriel Markus | 2-6 7-6(6) 6-2 | Renzo Furlan | Match data |
| Feb 7, 1991* | Guaruja | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Gabriel Markus | 6-3 6-4 | Renzo Furlan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renzo Furlan | #1,479 | #19 | 1,235 | 1,844 | 209 | 231 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Gabriel Markus | #1,346 | #36 | 809 | 1,725 | 56 | 71 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Renzo Furlan | Gabriel Markus | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #522 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #222 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #207 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #77 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #205 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #52 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #66 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #53 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #56 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1993 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #72 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #104 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1994 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #41 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #109 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1995 | 37–31 | 54.4% | #29 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1996 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #40 | 1,695 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #841 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1997 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1998 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #144 | 1,514 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1999 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #225 | 1,542 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #236 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,540 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2003 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #194 | 1,548 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |