H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Renzo Olivo vs Evgeny Donskoy H2H: 1-0
Renzo Olivo holds a 1–0 lead over Evgeny Donskoy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Renzo Olivo leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Renzo Olivo won the 2015 Quito third round 7-6(5) 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Argentina
Age 34
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 36
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2015* | Quito | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Renzo Olivo | 7-6(5) 3-6 6-1 | Evgeny Donskoy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renzo Olivo | #513 | #78 | 693 | 1,696 | 23 | 32 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Evgeny Donskoy | #1,380 | #65 | 764 | 1,791 | 50 | 111 | 31.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Renzo Olivo | Evgeny Donskoy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #514 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #472 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #259 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #275 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #81 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #173 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #113 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #144 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #125 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #72 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #214 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #97 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #123 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #172 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |