H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Ricardas Berankis vs Diego Schwartzman H2H: 0-1
Diego Schwartzman holds a 1–0 lead over Ricardas Berankis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Diego Schwartzman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Diego Schwartzman won the 2021 US Open first round 7-5 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Lithuania
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Argentina
Age 33
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2021* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Diego Schwartzman | 7-5 6-3 6-3 | Ricardas Berankis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ricardas Berankis | #435 | #50 | 909 | 1,830 | 104 | 145 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Diego Schwartzman | #879 | #8 | 3,765 | 2,047 | 238 | 211 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ricardas Berankis | Diego Schwartzman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #455 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2010 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #87 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #117 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #125 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #61 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 10–5 | 66.7% | #113 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #88 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #131 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2014 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #86 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #26 | 1,963 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2015 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #85 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #17 | 1,874 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2016 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #92 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #14 | 1,953 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2017 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #136 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #9 | 2,001 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2018 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #116 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #13 | 1,962 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2019 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #66 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #25 | 1,801 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2020 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #114 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2021 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #104 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,625 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2022 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #168 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #884 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #238 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |