H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

Ricardas Berankis vs Dominic Thiem H2H: 0-1

Dominic Thiem holds a 1–0 lead over Ricardas Berankis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dominic Thiem leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dominic Thiem won the 2016 US Open second round 6-4 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ricardas Berankis
Lithuania Age 36 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Dominic Thiem
AUT Age 33 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dominic Thiem #10 6-4 6-3 6-2 Ricardas Berankis #89 Match data Sep 1, 2016* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ricardas Berankis #435 #50 909 1,831 104 146 41.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dominic Thiem #1,174 #3 9,125 2,240 337 207 61.9% 1 1 0 5 10 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ricardas Berankis Dominic Thiem
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2011 1–3 25.0% #638 1,495 0 0
18 2008 0–2 0.0% #455 1,535 0 0 2012 1–2 33.3% #309 1,486 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2013 4–2 66.7% #139 1,580 0 0
20 2010 4–3 57.1% #87 1,698 0 0 2014 22–23 48.9% #39 1,852 0 0
21 2011 6–10 37.5% #125 1,679 0 0 2015 36–26 58.1% #20 1,891 0 3
22 2012 10–5 66.7% #113 1,772 0 0 2016 58–24 70.7% #8 2,005 0 7
23 2013 11–16 40.7% #131 1,656 0 0 2017 47–27 63.5% #5 1,958 0 8
24 2014 6–7 46.2% #86 1,732 0 0 2018 50–21 70.4% #8 2,066 0 11
25 2015 12–18 40.0% #85 1,716 0 0 2019 48–17 73.8% #4 2,143 0 16
26 2016 8–15 34.8% #92 1,670 0 0 2020 24–7 77.4% #3 2,201 1 17
27 2017 6–7 46.2% #136 1,696 0 0 2021 8–8 50.0% #15 2,014 1 17
28 2018 7–15 31.8% #116 1,679 0 0 2022 18–16 52.9% #102 1,907 1 17
29 2019 7–12 36.8% #66 1,709 0 0 2023 19–22 46.3% #98 1,799 1 17
30 2020 7–7 50.0% #69 1,777 0 0 2024 1–9 10.0% #524 1,628 1 17
31 2021 13–18 41.9% #104 1,707 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2022 7–10 41.2% #168 1,659 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2023 0–1 0.0% #238 1,643 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ricardas Berankis Dominic Thiem
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 2008 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2012 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
20 2010 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 2011 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — — — — — 2015 14 16 30 46.7% 20 6 26 76.9% 2 4 6 33.3%
22 2012 10 5 15 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2016 25 15 40 62.5% 25 7 32 78.1% 8 2 10 80.0%
23 2013 8 9 17 47.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 2017 21 19 40 52.5% 22 5 27 81.5% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 2014 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 23 11 34 67.6% 26 8 34 76.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 2015 11 10 21 52.4% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2019 25 9 34 73.5% 23 7 30 76.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2016 8 10 18 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2020 18 5 23 78.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
27 2017 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2021 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2018 6 12 18 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2022 11 7 18 61.1% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — —
29 2019 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2023 6 9 15 40.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 2 2 0.0%
30 2020 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2021 9 10 19 47.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 6 6 12 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 89 99 188 47.3% 10 28 38 26.3% 5 19 24 20.8% — 161 115 276 58.3% 161 74 235 68.5% 15 18 33 45.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 248/250 of Ricardas Berankis's and 539/544 of Dominic Thiem's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ricardas Berankis Dominic Thiem
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 4/4 4.0 2.8 48.1% 75.6% 37.4% 48.4% 86.1% 55.7% 33.4%
18 2008 2/2 1.5 3.5 45.9% 61.8% 40.9% 31.4% 8.3% 51.2% 31.5% 2012 3/3 5.0 3.0 61.3% 75.2% 45.6% 73.5% 38.9% 63.6% 28.9%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 6/6 5.8 2.5 54.7% 78.5% 62.7% 58.8% 39.6% 70.9% 38.3%
20 2010 7/7 9.6 6.6 53.1% 75.9% 54.6% 47.3% 43.2% 65.8% 35.8% 2014 44/45 4.4 2.9 57.3% 72.6% 50.7% 58.4% 41.6% 62.9% 37.1%
21 2011 16/16 6.3 4.3 50.9% 72.8% 48.4% 57.9% 47.4% 61.0% 37.0% 2015 62/62 5.9 2.3 56.6% 74.8% 56.2% 58.9% 35.8% 66.5% 37.1%
22 2012 15/15 4.5 3.3 49.1% 76.1% 55.9% 57.6% 30.0% 65.7% 37.9% 2016 80/82 5.9 2.9 61.4% 74.3% 54.1% 56.1% 40.5% 66.4% 37.4%
23 2013 27/27 6.1 4.5 55.0% 72.6% 53.3% 64.4% 34.9% 63.8% 35.7% 2017 74/74 6.1 3.1 58.8% 75.2% 52.6% 61.5% 41.3% 65.9% 38.5%
24 2014 13/13 2.8 1.6 56.8% 71.0% 50.0% 51.6% 29.0% 61.8% 36.1% 2018 70/71 7.3 3.5 58.8% 75.9% 53.3% 63.4% 39.3% 66.5% 38.4%
25 2015 30/30 5.4 3.8 57.5% 73.1% 54.7% 64.4% 46.4% 65.2% 34.4% 2019 64/65 4.8 2.1 65.8% 73.6% 56.2% 60.7% 45.4% 67.6% 38.0%
26 2016 22/23 3.0 3.3 57.5% 66.7% 49.4% 53.7% 41.4% 59.3% 37.0% 2020 31/31 7.1 2.8 63.4% 74.0% 53.5% 64.3% 43.8% 66.4% 38.0%
27 2017 12/13 3.1 2.8 56.8% 65.4% 52.0% 52.8% 43.0% 59.5% 35.4% 2021 16/16 4.6 2.6 63.9% 72.8% 54.3% 66.1% 46.9% 66.2% 36.4%
28 2018 22/22 4.6 3.4 59.6% 69.9% 49.4% 59.5% 46.4% 61.2% 31.7% 2022 34/34 4.3 2.2 63.3% 68.8% 52.8% 50.6% 35.6% 63.3% 36.5%
29 2019 19/19 3.7 3.2 58.3% 67.8% 52.3% 54.7% 43.6% 61.4% 36.1% 2023 41/41 5.4 2.9 60.8% 72.2% 52.2% 61.4% 33.1% 64.3% 34.1%
30 2020 14/14 4.4 3.5 59.9% 70.1% 50.2% 56.2% 40.6% 61.9% 37.3% 2024 10/10 5.9 3.3 58.0% 67.4% 53.0% 48.4% 38.6% 61.4% 27.8%
31 2021 31/31 2.7 2.8 60.6% 68.7% 48.3% 57.3% 38.5% 60.8% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 17/17 2.4 2.6 60.5% 69.3% 49.1% 49.3% 43.6% 61.3% 33.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 1/1 5.0 3.0 59.1% 66.7% 40.7% 40.0% 0.0% 56.1% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 248/250 4.3 3.4 57.0% 70.4% 51.1% 57.0% 40.4% 62.1% 35.7% — 539/544 5.7 2.8 60.4% 73.8% 53.6% 59.6% 40.4% 65.7% 37.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ricardas Berankis Dominic Thiem
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1491 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1496 112.5 -2.63 -3.33 0.753 45.1% +32 — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.02
18 2008 1536 110.1 -0.85 -3.54 0.646 41.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.08 2012 1487 106.1 +0.37 -3.45 0.794 48.0% — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 1–1 — +0.16
19 2009 1519 98.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1580 124.6 +2.00 -0.38 1.319 54.2% -19 -9 — 64.3% +1.29 1–1 0–1 — +0.35
20 2010 1698 127.4 +0.74 -0.38 1.048 51.2% -45 — — 54.2% +0.67 1–1 3–3 (50%) — +0.08 2014 1853 150.8 -0.10 +1.26 1.001 49.9% -30 -16 — 50.0% -0.09 8–8 (50%) 9–6 (60%) 104.7 -1.38
21 2011 1679 131.2 -1.17 +1.02 0.948 49.2% -17 — — 43.2% -0.68 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) 94.5 -0.45 2015 1892 154.0 +1.96 +1.24 1.108 51.3% -65 +157 -301 51.8% +0.13 10–9 (53%) 17–24 (41%) 97.2 +0.34
22 2012 1772 131.1 +1.42 +0.64 1.106 51.1% +4 — — 58.6% +0.21 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 103.0 +0.30 2016 2006 168.6 +3.18 +1.63 1.114 51.5% -61 +166 -227 63.5% +0.71 21–3 (88%) 20–14 (59%) 118.6 -0.64
23 2013 1656 132.6 -0.15 -0.33 0.985 49.7% +45 -87 -52 45.8% -0.19 3–7 (30%) 7–6 (54%) 95.3 -0.35 2017 1959 167.8 +2.96 +2.51 1.131 52.0% -82 +337 -151 63.7% +0.80 7–12 (37%) 14–14 (50%) 93.6 +0.76
24 2014 1733 127.5 -1.09 +0.05 0.943 48.6% +16 -28 — 37.9% -0.62 3–1 (75%) 2–3 (40%) 101.8 -0.15 2018 2067 169.1 +3.22 +2.98 1.147 52.2% -45 +195 -279 66.7% +0.99 14–5 (74%) 17–14 (55%) 103.1 +0.03
25 2015 1716 139.0 +0.12 -1.22 0.990 50.1% +31 -109 -82 43.9% -0.39 4–10 (29%) 7–11 (39%) 94.2 +0.66 2019 2144 172.9 +3.94 +3.40 1.174 52.5% -34 +136 — 65.6% +0.78 14–3 (82%) 16–12 (57%) 111.2 -1.32
26 2016 1670 128.7 -2.73 +0.24 0.911 48.1% +60 — -131 35.5% -0.94 5–4 (56%) 4–7 (36%) 100.1 +1.16 2020 2202 171.1 +4.24 +2.58 1.132 52.4% +10 +19 — 69.1% +1.14 7–3 (70%) 15–9 (63%) 102.9 -2.09
27 2017 1697 129.0 -1.63 -1.47 0.873 47.4% +59 — — 39.4% -0.73 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — +0.35 2021 2015 141.5 +1.76 +0.56 1.075 51.5% +142 +122 — 52.3% +0.34 4–3 (57%) 4–3 (57%) 97.8 +0.26
28 2018 1679 132.8 -2.24 -3.20 0.818 46.8% +25 — -162 30.8% -1.08 5–2 (71%) 5–10 (33%) 101.2 -0.96 2022 1908 145.5 +0.24 +0.10 0.994 49.8% +149 +46 — 47.6% -0.26 10–5 (67%) 14–4 (78%) 103.9 -2.20
29 2019 1710 139.9 -1.07 +0.48 0.935 48.9% +10 — — 44.4% -0.67 2–7 (22%) 8–2 (80%) 100.5 -0.84 2023 1800 137.0 -0.18 -1.41 0.957 49.4% +72 +55 — 47.5% -0.20 8–9 (47%) 10–10 (50%) 96.8 -1.03
30 2020 1777 136.9 -0.68 -0.02 0.978 49.6% -12 — — 51.2% -0.02 2–3 (40%) 5–6 (45%) 98.7 +0.72 2024 1628 110.1 -2.09 -4.22 0.720 45.2% +169 +71 — 19.2% -1.54 1–2 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 94.8 -0.23
31 2021 1708 131.1 -1.85 +0.30 0.957 49.4% -6 -89 — 44.6% -0.36 1–4 (20%) 7–3 (70%) 100.7 +1.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 1660 130.7 -1.63 -0.82 0.866 47.8% +26 -78 — 39.5% -0.84 2–0 3–1 (75%) — -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 1644 105.8 -0.30 +0.53 0.706 44.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1831 139.3 -1.02 -0.43 0.940 48.9% +19 -82 -105 42.7% -0.50 35–47 (43%) 56–57 (50%) 98.9 +0.29 — 2241 165.8 +2.25 +1.56 1.084 51.3% -20 +139 -230 58.6% +0.47 105–65 (62%) 138–117 (54%) 106.3 -1.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.