H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Ricardas Berankis vs Evgeny Donskoy H2H: 2-1
Ricardas Berankis holds a 2–1 lead over Evgeny Donskoy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Ricardas Berankis leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ricardas Berankis won the 2021 Moscow third round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Lithuania
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 36
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2021* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Ricardas Berankis | 6-1 6-3 | Evgeny Donskoy | Match data |
| Jun 28, 2018* | Antalya | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Ricardas Berankis | 6-2 6-7(4) 6-3 | Evgeny Donskoy | Match data |
| Oct 23, 2015* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Evgeny Donskoy | 6-4 7-5 | Ricardas Berankis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ricardas Berankis | #435 | #50 | 909 | 1,830 | 104 | 145 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Evgeny Donskoy | #1,380 | #65 | 764 | 1,791 | 50 | 111 | 31.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ricardas Berankis | Evgeny Donskoy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #455 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #514 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #472 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #87 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #259 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #125 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 10–5 | 66.7% | #113 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #81 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #131 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #113 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #86 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #85 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #92 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #125 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #136 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #72 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #116 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #97 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #66 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2020 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #123 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2021 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #104 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #172 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2022 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #168 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #238 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |