H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Ricardas Berankis vs Filip Krajinovic H2H: 1-0

Ricardas Berankis holds a 1–0 lead over Filip Krajinovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ricardas Berankis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ricardas Berankis won the 2017 Moscow round of 16 3-6 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ricardas Berankis
Lithuania Age 36 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Filip Krajinovic
SRB Age 34 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Filip Krajinovic #113 6-3 7-5 Ricardas Berankis #95 Match data Mar 8, 2019* Q2 Q Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Ricardas Berankis #169 3-6 7-5 6-4 Filip Krajinovic #77 Match data Oct 20, 2017* R16 Moscow ATP 250 Hard
Ricardas Berankis #115 6-4 6-2 Filip Krajinovic #101 Match data Sep 29, 2014 Q1 Q China Open ATP 500 Hard

2 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ricardas Berankis #435 #50 909 1,831 104 146 41.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Filip Krajinovic #1,204 #26 1,724 1,979 115 125 47.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ricardas Berankis Filip Krajinovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2009 0–1 0.0% #352 1,481 0 0
18 2008 0–2 0.0% #455 1,535 0 0 2010 3–3 50.0% #214 1,508 0 0
20 2010 4–3 57.1% #87 1,698 0 0 2012 1–2 33.3% #420 1,541 0 0
21 2011 6–10 37.5% #125 1,679 0 0 2013 0–1 0.0% #226 1,584 0 0
22 2012 10–5 66.7% #113 1,772 0 0 2014 4–4 50.0% #100 1,670 0 0
23 2013 11–16 40.7% #131 1,656 0 0 2015 3–11 21.4% #101 1,674 0 0
24 2014 6–7 46.2% #86 1,732 0 0 2016 1–5 16.7% #234 1,662 0 0
25 2015 12–18 40.0% #85 1,716 0 0 2017 6–2 75.0% #34 1,778 0 0
26 2016 8–15 34.8% #92 1,670 0 0 2018 14–17 45.2% #94 1,759 0 0
27 2017 6–7 46.2% #136 1,696 0 0 2019 27–17 61.4% #40 1,900 0 0
28 2018 7–15 31.8% #116 1,679 0 0 2020 16–12 57.1% #31 1,870 0 0
29 2019 7–12 36.8% #66 1,709 0 0 2021 20–22 47.6% #42 1,758 0 0
30 2020 7–7 50.0% #69 1,777 0 0 2022 17–16 51.5% #54 1,829 0 0
31 2021 13–18 41.9% #104 1,707 0 0 2023 3–12 20.0% #311 1,674 0 0
32 2022 7–10 41.2% #168 1,659 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2023 0–1 0.0% #238 1,643 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ricardas Berankis Filip Krajinovic
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 2008 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
20 2010 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2012 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 2011 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — — — — — 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2012 10 5 15 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2014 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
23 2013 8 9 17 47.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 2015 2 8 10 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2014 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
25 2015 11 10 21 52.4% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2017 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2016 8 10 18 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2018 14 16 30 46.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2017 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2019 18 12 30 60.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2018 6 12 18 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2020 14 10 24 58.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
29 2019 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2021 8 12 20 40.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2020 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2022 6 8 14 42.9% 6 6 12 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4%
31 2021 9 10 19 47.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2023 3 6 9 33.3% 0 6 6 0.0% — — — —
32 2022 6 6 12 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 89 99 188 47.3% 10 28 38 26.3% 5 19 24 20.8% — 74 81 155 47.7% 36 38 74 48.6% 5 6 11 45.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 248/250 of Ricardas Berankis's and 237/240 of Filip Krajinovic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ricardas Berankis Filip Krajinovic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 1/1 1.0 1.0 59.0% 55.6% 36.0% 41.7% 57.1% 47.5% 43.8%
18 2008 2/2 1.5 3.5 45.9% 61.8% 40.9% 31.4% 8.3% 51.2% 31.5% 2010 6/6 3.3 2.3 61.3% 61.1% 49.0% 31.7% 25.5% 56.8% 38.0%
20 2010 7/7 9.6 6.6 53.1% 75.9% 54.6% 47.3% 43.2% 65.8% 35.8% 2012 3/3 0.3 2.0 58.3% 50.8% 36.7% 32.7% 76.7% 45.5% 36.1%
21 2011 16/16 6.3 4.3 50.9% 72.8% 48.4% 57.9% 47.4% 61.0% 37.0% 2013 1/1 6.0 1.0 57.7% 75.0% 45.5% 78.6% 50.0% 62.5% 34.0%
22 2012 15/15 4.5 3.3 49.1% 76.1% 55.9% 57.6% 30.0% 65.7% 37.9% 2014 8/8 5.3 0.9 57.1% 74.4% 55.1% 60.9% 33.8% 65.5% 34.3%
23 2013 27/27 6.1 4.5 55.0% 72.6% 53.3% 64.4% 34.9% 63.8% 35.7% 2015 14/14 4.4 3.4 60.0% 65.8% 50.6% 55.4% 36.0% 59.5% 35.0%
24 2014 13/13 2.8 1.6 56.8% 71.0% 50.0% 51.6% 29.0% 61.8% 36.1% 2016 5/6 3.2 2.2 67.4% 56.7% 41.7% 51.2% 19.7% 51.7% 33.7%
25 2015 30/30 5.4 3.8 57.5% 73.1% 54.7% 64.4% 46.4% 65.2% 34.4% 2017 7/8 7.7 2.0 66.6% 73.5% 53.0% 56.0% 64.8% 67.1% 36.1%
26 2016 22/23 3.0 3.3 57.5% 66.7% 49.4% 53.7% 41.4% 59.3% 37.0% 2018 31/31 4.5 2.2 63.1% 66.7% 52.4% 61.7% 38.0% 61.5% 38.1%
27 2017 12/13 3.1 2.8 56.8% 65.4% 52.0% 52.8% 43.0% 59.5% 35.4% 2019 44/44 5.3 1.5 65.5% 70.1% 52.7% 61.0% 46.0% 64.1% 38.7%
28 2018 22/22 4.6 3.4 59.6% 69.9% 49.4% 59.5% 46.4% 61.2% 31.7% 2020 28/28 4.3 1.7 65.0% 70.8% 51.6% 66.0% 46.3% 64.0% 40.7%
29 2019 19/19 3.7 3.2 58.3% 67.8% 52.3% 54.7% 43.6% 61.4% 36.1% 2021 41/42 4.7 2.2 62.7% 70.6% 53.1% 60.2% 44.1% 64.1% 36.7%
30 2020 14/14 4.4 3.5 59.9% 70.1% 50.2% 56.2% 40.6% 61.9% 37.3% 2022 33/33 3.7 2.1 63.7% 68.3% 53.7% 60.9% 48.5% 62.8% 35.0%
31 2021 31/31 2.7 2.8 60.6% 68.7% 48.3% 57.3% 38.5% 60.8% 37.5% 2023 15/15 4.5 1.5 64.9% 62.5% 50.5% 45.3% 40.5% 58.5% 31.9%
32 2022 17/17 2.4 2.6 60.5% 69.3% 49.1% 49.3% 43.6% 61.3% 33.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 1/1 5.0 3.0 59.1% 66.7% 40.7% 40.0% 0.0% 56.1% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 248/250 4.3 3.4 57.0% 70.4% 51.1% 57.0% 40.4% 62.1% 35.7% — 237/240 4.5 2.0 63.5% 68.3% 51.9% 58.7% 43.6% 62.3% 37.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ricardas Berankis Filip Krajinovic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1469 91.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1481 101.7 -1.43 -4.20 0.834 45.6% — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.02
18 2008 1536 110.1 -0.85 -3.54 0.646 41.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.08 2010 1508 100.4 -1.60 +0.61 0.880 46.7% — +89 — 38.5% -1.23 2–1 (67%) 3–0 (100%) — -0.13
19 2009 1519 98.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 1698 127.4 +0.74 -0.38 1.048 51.2% -45 — — 54.2% +0.67 1–1 3–3 (50%) — +0.08 2012 1541 108.9 -1.83 +0.43 0.663 41.3% — +99 — 28.6% -2.43 — — — +0.34
21 2011 1679 131.2 -1.17 +1.02 0.948 49.2% -17 — — 43.2% -0.68 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) 94.5 -0.45 2013 1584 113.3 +2.82 -1.59 0.908 49.0% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 0–1 — -0.01
22 2012 1772 131.1 +1.42 +0.64 1.106 51.1% +4 — — 58.6% +0.21 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 103.0 +0.30 2014 1671 126.4 +0.29 -1.85 0.997 50.1% -62 +55 — 52.9% +0.29 1–0 0–1 — +0.04
23 2013 1656 132.6 -0.15 -0.33 0.985 49.7% +45 -87 -52 45.8% -0.19 3–7 (30%) 7–6 (54%) 95.3 -0.35 2015 1675 122.4 -2.65 -0.30 0.866 47.4% -1 +17 — 27.8% -1.11 0–3 (0%) 0–5 (0%) 94.1 -0.43
24 2014 1733 127.5 -1.09 +0.05 0.943 48.6% +16 -28 — 37.9% -0.62 3–1 (75%) 2–3 (40%) 101.8 -0.15 2016 1662 111.8 -3.31 -2.33 0.697 43.0% — +16 — 22.2% -2.11 1–0 — — +0.13
25 2015 1716 139.0 +0.12 -1.22 0.990 50.1% +31 -109 -82 43.9% -0.39 4–10 (29%) 7–11 (39%) 94.2 +0.66 2017 1779 129.6 +1.67 +1.48 1.099 52.0% +24 — — 66.7% +0.83 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.57
26 2016 1670 128.7 -2.73 +0.24 0.911 48.1% +60 — -131 35.5% -0.94 5–4 (56%) 4–7 (36%) 100.1 +1.16 2018 1759 156.1 -1.36 +1.87 0.990 49.7% +19 — — 48.6% +0.01 3–5 (38%) 3–6 (33%) 96.4 +0.72
27 2017 1697 129.0 -1.63 -1.47 0.873 47.4% +59 — — 39.4% -0.73 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — +0.35 2019 1900 160.4 +0.40 +2.33 1.077 51.3% +13 -72 — 58.5% +0.48 10–7 (59%) 9–9 (50%) 104.8 -2.80
28 2018 1679 132.8 -2.24 -3.20 0.818 46.8% +25 — -162 30.8% -1.08 5–2 (71%) 5–10 (33%) 101.2 -0.96 2020 1870 159.0 +0.84 +3.58 1.132 52.1% +27 -68 — 55.7% +0.39 3–3 (50%) 5–8 (38%) 95.9 -0.70
29 2019 1710 139.9 -1.07 +0.48 0.935 48.9% +10 — — 44.4% -0.67 2–7 (22%) 8–2 (80%) 100.5 -0.84 2021 1758 149.4 +0.81 +0.15 1.022 50.6% +33 +79 — 45.1% +0.05 6–5 (55%) 5–11 (31%) 97.4 +0.69
30 2020 1777 136.9 -0.68 -0.02 0.978 49.6% -12 — — 51.2% -0.02 2–3 (40%) 5–6 (45%) 98.7 +0.72 2022 1829 148.5 -0.77 -0.15 0.939 49.2% -61 +34 -179 47.0% -0.11 6–2 (75%) 9–9 (50%) 104.9 -0.67
31 2021 1708 131.1 -1.85 +0.30 0.957 49.4% -6 -89 — 44.6% -0.36 1–4 (20%) 7–3 (70%) 100.7 +1.01 2023 1675 118.7 -3.08 -2.02 0.768 45.9% +36 +15 — 25.6% -1.72 3–4 (43%) 2–2 (50%) 97.1 -0.87
32 2022 1660 130.7 -1.63 -0.82 0.866 47.8% +26 -78 — 39.5% -0.84 2–0 3–1 (75%) — -0.60 2024 1640 102.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 1644 105.8 -0.30 +0.53 0.706 44.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1831 139.3 -1.02 -0.43 0.940 48.9% +19 -82 -105 42.7% -0.50 35–47 (43%) 56–57 (50%) 98.9 +0.29 — 1980 148.7 -0.39 +0.89 0.981 49.7% +11 +27 -179 47.4% -0.12 37–34 (52%) 38–53 (42%) 97.8 -1.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.