H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Ricardas Berankis vs Gilles Simon H2H: 1-0

Ricardas Berankis holds a 1–0 lead over Gilles Simon in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ricardas Berankis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ricardas Berankis won the 2014 Shenzhen round of 32 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ricardas Berankis
Lithuania Age 36 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Gilles Simon
FRA Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ricardas Berankis #120 6-4 6-2 Gilles Simon #34 Match data Sep 25, 2014* R32 Shenzhen ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ricardas Berankis #435 #50 909 1,831 104 146 41.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gilles Simon #464 #6 4,170 2,092 499 383 56.6% 0 0 0 1 13 14

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ricardas Berankis Gilles Simon
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2008 0–2 0.0% #455 1,535 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — 2004 0–1 0.0% #177 1,460 0 0
20 2010 4–3 57.1% #87 1,698 0 0 2005 6–6 50.0% #124 1,540 0 0
21 2011 6–10 37.5% #125 1,679 0 0 2006 24–24 50.0% #45 1,633 0 0
22 2012 10–5 66.7% #113 1,772 0 0 2007 35–26 57.4% #29 1,783 0 2
23 2013 11–16 40.7% #131 1,656 0 0 2008 52–27 65.8% #7 1,983 0 5
24 2014 6–7 46.2% #86 1,732 0 0 2009 45–24 65.2% #15 1,939 0 6
25 2015 12–18 40.0% #85 1,716 0 0 2010 22–17 56.4% #41 1,928 0 7
26 2016 8–15 34.8% #92 1,670 0 0 2011 38–25 60.3% #12 1,906 0 9
27 2017 6–7 46.2% #136 1,696 0 0 2012 43–24 64.2% #16 1,950 0 10
28 2018 7–15 31.8% #116 1,679 0 0 2013 36–22 62.1% #19 1,925 0 11
29 2019 7–12 36.8% #66 1,709 0 0 2014 28–25 52.8% #21 1,946 0 11
30 2020 7–7 50.0% #69 1,777 0 0 2015 41–22 65.1% #15 1,989 0 12
31 2021 13–18 41.9% #104 1,707 0 0 2016 32–26 55.2% #25 1,945 0 12
32 2022 7–10 41.2% #168 1,659 0 0 2017 15–25 37.5% #89 1,767 0 12
33 2023 0–1 0.0% #238 1,643 0 0 2018 33–24 57.9% #30 1,869 0 14
34 — — — — — — — 2019 27–28 49.1% #55 1,776 0 14
35 — — — — — — — 2020 10–12 45.5% #63 1,755 0 14
36 — — — — — — — 2021 5–17 22.7% #122 1,624 0 14
37 — — — — — — — 2022 7–8 46.7% #143 1,703 0 14

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ricardas Berankis Gilles Simon
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2008 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2005 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
21 2011 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 7 9 16 43.8% 15 10 25 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2012 10 5 15 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 14 11 25 56.0% 18 10 28 64.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 2013 8 9 17 47.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2008 32 18 50 64.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
24 2014 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 34 15 49 69.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
25 2015 11 10 21 52.4% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2010 17 13 30 56.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
26 2016 8 10 18 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2011 22 16 38 57.9% 14 7 21 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2017 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 22 12 34 64.7% 18 9 27 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
28 2018 6 12 18 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2013 23 14 37 62.2% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
29 2019 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2014 17 14 31 54.8% 8 9 17 47.1% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
30 2020 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 25 15 40 62.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — —
31 2021 9 10 19 47.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2016 22 17 39 56.4% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
32 2022 6 6 12 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2017 9 13 22 40.9% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
33 2023 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2018 19 13 32 59.4% 10 8 18 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 14 18 32 43.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 10 10 20 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 4 7 11 36.4% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 89 99 188 47.3% 10 28 38 26.3% 5 19 24 20.8% — — — — — 297 224 521 57.0% 146 112 258 56.6% 52 42 94 55.3% 4 5 9 44.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 248/250 of Ricardas Berankis's and 866/882 of Gilles Simon's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ricardas Berankis Gilles Simon
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2008 2/2 1.5 3.5 45.9% 61.8% 40.9% 31.4% 8.3% 51.2% 31.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 1/1 5.0 1.0 69.7% 64.5% 55.6% 50.0% 100.0% 61.8% 38.0%
20 2010 7/7 9.6 6.6 53.1% 75.9% 54.6% 47.3% 43.2% 65.8% 35.8% 2005 12/12 3.5 1.8 54.6% 66.1% 51.5% 51.7% 45.2% 59.6% 38.6%
21 2011 16/16 6.3 4.3 50.9% 72.8% 48.4% 57.9% 47.4% 61.0% 37.0% 2006 48/48 4.0 1.6 54.9% 67.0% 50.5% 50.9% 41.9% 59.4% 39.0%
22 2012 15/15 4.5 3.3 49.1% 76.1% 55.9% 57.6% 30.0% 65.7% 37.9% 2007 61/61 3.7 1.8 56.8% 66.3% 49.4% 57.1% 50.7% 59.1% 40.4%
23 2013 27/27 6.1 4.5 55.0% 72.6% 53.3% 64.4% 34.9% 63.8% 35.7% 2008 75/79 4.5 2.1 57.5% 69.6% 53.7% 57.5% 39.4% 62.8% 39.4%
24 2014 13/13 2.8 1.6 56.8% 71.0% 50.0% 51.6% 29.0% 61.8% 36.1% 2009 69/69 6.1 2.1 55.0% 74.4% 54.7% 66.1% 46.9% 65.6% 39.4%
25 2015 30/30 5.4 3.8 57.5% 73.1% 54.7% 64.4% 46.4% 65.2% 34.4% 2010 38/39 6.1 2.5 55.7% 75.1% 53.0% 61.3% 36.9% 65.4% 36.8%
26 2016 22/23 3.0 3.3 57.5% 66.7% 49.4% 53.7% 41.4% 59.3% 37.0% 2011 63/63 4.7 2.5 56.0% 69.4% 50.9% 52.0% 46.6% 61.3% 40.9%
27 2017 12/13 3.1 2.8 56.8% 65.4% 52.0% 52.8% 43.0% 59.5% 35.4% 2012 63/67 4.0 2.0 55.9% 69.9% 52.9% 57.5% 41.4% 62.3% 40.5%
28 2018 22/22 4.6 3.4 59.6% 69.9% 49.4% 59.5% 46.4% 61.2% 31.7% 2013 58/58 4.1 2.5 56.8% 69.0% 49.7% 59.2% 41.8% 60.6% 39.1%
29 2019 19/19 3.7 3.2 58.3% 67.8% 52.3% 54.7% 43.6% 61.4% 36.1% 2014 52/53 5.8 2.5 55.8% 71.4% 50.8% 63.3% 43.7% 62.7% 40.0%
30 2020 14/14 4.4 3.5 59.9% 70.1% 50.2% 56.2% 40.6% 61.9% 37.3% 2015 63/63 3.6 2.4 58.3% 68.7% 52.6% 53.5% 50.8% 62.1% 40.9%
31 2021 31/31 2.7 2.8 60.6% 68.7% 48.3% 57.3% 38.5% 60.8% 37.5% 2016 55/58 3.3 2.6 57.9% 67.1% 52.5% 57.3% 45.0% 60.7% 40.1%
32 2022 17/17 2.4 2.6 60.5% 69.3% 49.1% 49.3% 43.6% 61.3% 33.5% 2017 40/40 2.9 2.6 55.0% 67.7% 51.1% 55.2% 44.6% 60.4% 37.9%
33 2023 1/1 5.0 3.0 59.1% 66.7% 40.7% 40.0% 0.0% 56.1% 31.0% 2018 56/57 4.4 2.2 60.5% 70.8% 50.8% 56.2% 44.5% 62.9% 41.2%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 54/55 3.9 2.6 62.1% 68.3% 49.8% 61.7% 42.1% 61.6% 39.0%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 22/22 4.4 3.0 55.1% 70.4% 50.2% 53.1% 48.8% 61.8% 40.4%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 21/22 2.3 4.2 60.6% 66.3% 44.6% 45.0% 48.5% 57.5% 34.9%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 15/15 2.9 2.2 61.4% 65.3% 48.5% 54.8% 40.7% 58.5% 36.5%
Career — 248/250 4.3 3.4 57.0% 70.4% 51.1% 57.0% 40.4% 62.1% 35.7% — 866/882 4.3 2.3 57.2% 69.4% 51.4% 57.2% 44.5% 61.8% 39.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ricardas Berankis Gilles Simon
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2008 1536 110.1 -0.85 -3.54 0.646 41.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1519 98.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1460 98.1 -0.26 -0.85 0.994 50.6% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.17
20 2010 1698 127.4 +0.74 -0.38 1.048 51.2% -45 — — 54.2% +0.67 1–1 3–3 (50%) — +0.08 2005 1540 122.5 -2.20 +0.53 0.954 48.7% -20 +36 — 42.4% -0.36 6–1 (86%) 0–4 (0%) — +0.22
21 2011 1679 131.2 -1.17 +1.02 0.948 49.2% -17 — — 43.2% -0.68 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.45 2006 1633 131.6 -2.73 +1.62 0.960 49.1% -36 +38 -42 46.2% -0.23 12–4 (75%) 5–9 (36%) — -0.30
22 2012 1772 131.1 +1.42 +0.64 1.106 51.1% +4 — — 58.6% +0.21 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.30 2007 1784 140.3 -2.50 +3.16 0.988 50.0% -97 +67 -200 50.7% +0.01 14–6 (70%) 10–9 (53%) — -1.35
23 2013 1656 132.6 -0.15 -0.33 0.985 49.7% +45 -87 -52 45.8% -0.19 3–7 (30%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.35 2008 1984 156.8 +0.08 +3.37 1.060 51.1% -7 -90 -295 59.8% +0.54 21–9 (70%) 17–9 (65%) — +0.42
24 2014 1733 127.5 -1.09 +0.05 0.943 48.6% +16 -28 — 37.9% -0.62 3–1 (75%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.15 2009 1940 155.0 +1.89 +2.48 1.145 52.4% +57 -140 -158 62.4% +0.88 13–10 (57%) 16–10 (62%) — +4.99
25 2015 1716 139.0 +0.12 -1.22 0.990 50.1% +31 -109 -82 43.9% -0.39 4–10 (29%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.66 2010 1928 152.1 +2.01 +0.87 1.063 50.8% +47 -166 -126 50.0% +0.16 11–3 (79%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.07
26 2016 1670 128.7 -2.73 +0.24 0.911 48.1% +60 — -131 35.5% -0.94 5–4 (56%) 4–7 (36%) — +1.16 2011 1907 159.5 -0.73 +3.87 1.055 51.0% -11 +50 -96 58.9% +0.64 12–12 (50%) 11–15 (42%) — +0.18
27 2017 1697 129.0 -1.63 -1.47 0.873 47.4% +59 — — 39.4% -0.73 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — +0.35 2012 1950 157.5 -0.02 +3.35 1.075 51.2% +13 +23 -123 59.0% +0.54 11–10 (52%) 9–13 (41%) — +3.21
28 2018 1679 132.8 -2.24 -3.20 0.818 46.8% +25 — -162 30.8% -1.08 5–2 (71%) 5–10 (33%) — -0.96 2013 1925 156.5 -2.02 +2.35 0.991 50.1% +20 +80 -82 57.2% +0.14 11–6 (65%) 16–8 (67%) — +1.94
29 2019 1710 139.9 -1.07 +0.48 0.935 48.9% +10 — — 44.4% -0.67 2–7 (22%) 8–2 (80%) — -0.84 2014 1947 160.4 -0.47 +3.65 1.071 51.4% +27 -53 -64 51.9% +0.42 9–9 (50%) 9–12 (43%) — +1.84
30 2020 1777 136.9 -0.68 -0.02 0.978 49.6% -12 — — 51.2% -0.02 2–3 (40%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.72 2015 1990 161.4 -1.32 +4.77 1.080 51.5% -18 -44 +40 60.4% +0.66 15–8 (65%) 12–13 (48%) — +1.25
31 2021 1708 131.1 -1.85 +0.30 0.957 49.4% -6 -89 — 44.6% -0.36 1–4 (20%) 7–3 (70%) — +1.01 2016 1945 160.5 -1.63 +3.73 1.020 50.5% +22 -37 +11 53.5% +0.21 13–10 (57%) 13–11 (54%) — +1.19
32 2022 1660 130.7 -1.63 -0.82 0.866 47.8% +26 -78 — 39.5% -0.84 2–0 3–1 (75%) — -0.60 2017 1767 147.6 -2.41 +2.04 0.958 49.2% +68 +9 +71 41.3% -0.41 7–7 (50%) 5–10 (33%) — -1.50
33 2023 1644 105.8 -0.30 +0.53 0.706 44.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.12 2018 1870 151.0 -0.74 +4.77 1.113 51.8% -5 -66 -8 59.4% +0.68 6–8 (43%) 21–16 (57%) — +0.92
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1777 145.4 -2.46 +2.32 1.015 49.9% +15 -28 +102 50.4% +0.06 12–7 (63%) 10–15 (40%) — +2.17
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1756 144.5 -1.00 +2.76 1.058 50.9% +43 — — 48.2% +0.12 2–3 (40%) 4–2 (67%) — -1.39
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1625 120.8 -3.59 -1.65 0.820 46.4% +88 -27 +101 30.4% -1.23 2–6 (25%) 1–5 (17%) — -1.48
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1704 125.3 -2.58 +1.62 0.879 47.7% +12 -42 — 44.4% -0.72 4–0 (100%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.44
Career — 1831 139.3 -1.02 -0.43 0.940 48.9% +19 -82 -105 42.7% -0.50 35–47 (43%) 56–57 (50%) 98.9 +0.29 — 2092 157.4 -1.00 +2.94 1.034 50.6% +11 -7 -45 54.1% +0.28 181–120 (60%) 168–170 (50%) 105.5 +1.37

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.