H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Ricardo Acuna vs Eddie Dibbs H2H: 0-1
Eddie Dibbs holds a 1–0 lead over Ricardo Acuna in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Eddie Dibbs leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Eddie Dibbs won the 1982 Quito fourth round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 68
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 75
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 1982* | Quito | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Eddie Dibbs | 7-5 6-1 | Ricardo Acuna | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ricardo Acuna | #1,264 | #47 | 19 | 1,729 | 60 | 101 | 37.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Eddie Dibbs | #798 | #5 | 0 | 2,168 | 607 | 264 | 69.7% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 22 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ricardo Acuna | Eddie Dibbs | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 7–4 | 63.6% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1979 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #312 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1980 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #151 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #28 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1981 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #151 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 62–30 | 67.4% | #22 | 1,907 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1982 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #100 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 53–25 | 67.9% | #18 | 2,050 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 1983 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #91 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 83–28 | 74.8% | #9 | 2,053 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1984 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #152 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 76–27 | 73.8% | #6 | 2,076 | 0 | 13 |
| 27 | 1985 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #57 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 82–27 | 75.2% | #6 | 1,998 | 0 | 17 |
| 28 | 1986 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #171 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 64–23 | 73.6% | #10 | 2,033 | 0 | 18 |
| 29 | 1987 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #199 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 49–21 | 70.0% | #12 | 1,928 | 0 | 20 |
| 30 | 1988 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #163 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 41–17 | 70.7% | #25 | 1,976 | 0 | 22 |
| 31 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #530 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #55 | 1,795 | 0 | 22 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #90 | 1,817 | 0 | 22 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #351 | 1,748 | 0 | 22 |