H2H data updated: 2026-08-27 00:00 UTC

Ricardo Acuna vs Harold Solomon H2H: 0-1

Harold Solomon holds a 1–0 lead over Ricardo Acuna in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Harold Solomon leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Harold Solomon won the 1984 U.S. Pro Tennis Championships round of 64 7-5 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ricardo Acuna
CHI Age 68 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Harold Solomon
USA Age 73 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Harold Solomon #187 7-5 7-6 Ricardo Acuna #129 Match data Jul 18, 1984* R64 U.S. Pro Tennis Championships ATP 250 Clay

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ricardo Acuna #1,264 #47 19 1,730 60 101 37.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Harold Solomon #1,115 #5 2 2,163 575 333 63.3% 0 2 0 0 20 22

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ricardo Acuna Harold Solomon
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,481 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1970 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1971 8–6 57.1% — 1,591 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1972 12–11 52.2% — 1,682 0 0
20 1978 0–1 0.0% #232 1,494 0 0 1973 21–23 47.7% #59 1,769 0 0
21 1979 3–2 60.0% #312 1,533 0 0 1974 59–38 60.8% #16 1,900 0 1
22 1980 2–3 40.0% #151 1,530 0 0 1975 69–31 69.0% #17 1,984 0 5
23 1981 2–9 18.2% — 1,506 0 0 1976 72–29 71.3% #8 2,048 0 10
24 1982 7–10 41.2% #100 1,545 0 0 1977 65–27 70.7% #16 2,001 0 13
25 1983 15–17 46.9% #91 1,630 0 0 1978 70–33 68.0% #9 1,907 0 15
26 1984 6–11 35.3% #152 1,585 0 0 1979 65–23 73.9% #8 2,002 0 18
27 1985 9–10 47.4% #57 1,631 0 0 1980 64–23 73.6% #7 1,993 0 22
28 1986 9–20 31.0% #171 1,565 0 0 1981 31–26 54.4% #21 1,758 0 22
29 1987 3–8 27.3% #199 1,522 0 0 1982 22–23 48.9% #66 1,798 0 22
30 1988 4–7 36.4% #163 1,576 0 0 1983 5–17 22.7% #95 1,623 0 22
31 1989 0–3 0.0% #530 1,535 0 0 1984 4–6 40.0% #223 1,633 0 22
32 — — — — — — — 1985 4–6 40.0% #106 1,615 0 22
33 — — — — — — — 1986 4–8 33.3% #240 1,594 0 22
38 — — — — — — — 1991 0–1 0.0% #1106 1,574 0 22

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ricardo Acuna Harold Solomon
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 3 2 5 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 5 2 7 71.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1978 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 9 6 15 60.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3%
21 1979 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1974 18 11 29 62.1% 31 13 44 70.5% 0 5 5 0.0% 10 9 19 52.6%
22 1980 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1975 19 10 29 65.5% 32 12 44 72.7% — — — — 18 9 27 66.7%
23 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1976 18 5 23 78.3% 35 11 46 76.1% — — — — 19 13 32 59.4%
24 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 1977 12 8 20 60.0% 40 9 49 81.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 13 8 21 61.9%
25 1983 7 7 14 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1978 18 9 27 66.7% 34 10 44 77.3% — — — — 18 14 32 56.3%
26 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 1979 22 8 30 73.3% 30 10 40 75.0% — — — — 13 5 18 72.2%
27 1985 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 1980 22 5 27 81.5% 25 8 33 75.8% — — — — 17 10 27 63.0%
28 1986 3 6 9 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 1981 12 9 21 57.1% 13 9 22 59.1% — — — — 6 8 14 42.9%
29 1987 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1982 14 9 23 60.9% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 3 8 11 27.3%
30 1988 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1983 1 5 6 16.7% 4 10 14 28.6% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
31 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 18 36 54 33.3% 16 37 53 30.2% 20 18 38 52.6% 6 10 16 37.5% — 176 97 273 64.5% 276 125 401 68.8% 2 14 16 12.5% 121 97 218 55.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ricardo Acuna Harold Solomon
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1481 98.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — +0.19
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1478 101.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — -0.19
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1591 125.4 — — — — +24 +9 — 52.9% +0.15 4–2 (67%) 1–3 (25%) +0.19
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1682 124.4 — — — — -23 +15 -168 45.8% -0.22 4–2 (67%) 2–4 (33%) -0.55
20 1978 1495 100.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — -0.07 1973 1770 142.1 — — — — -41 -43 -248 46.4% -0.25 9–8 (53%) 8–8 (50%) -6.25
21 1979 1533 111.1 — — — — — +42 — 50.0% -0.22 3–1 (75%) 1–0 +0.59 1974 1900 149.2 — — — — +2 +51 -443 55.8% +0.36 20–11 (65%) 10–5 (67%) -6.33
22 1980 1531 105.8 — — — — — +34 — 41.7% -0.50 1–1 1–2 (33%) +0.53 1975 1985 151.8 — — — — +2 -4 — 62.2% +0.94 22–8 (73%) 13–9 (59%) +0.71
23 1981 1507 124.9 — — — — — +39 — 25.0% -1.33 0–2 0–2 -0.31 1976 2048 164.0 — — — — -7 +44 — 64.0% +1.02 25–11 (69%) 12–9 (57%) -5.84
24 1982 1546 116.6 — — — — +26 -25 — 39.5% -0.74 2–0 1–3 (25%) +1.68 1977 2001 158.3 — — — — -33 +101 — 64.3% +1.02 19–6 (76%) 8–10 (44%) -3.30
25 1983 1630 124.4 — — — — -32 -101 +18 47.0% -0.28 4–5 (44%) 8–6 (57%) +1.87 1978 1908 162.9 — — — — +1 +188 — 62.8% +0.86 20–10 (67%) 15–9 (63%) -4.36
26 1984 1586 112.9 — — — — — -78 +84 29.3% -1.22 2–0 1–5 (17%) -0.43 1979 2002 161.8 — — — — +9 +80 — 67.4% +1.21 19–10 (66%) 12–5 (71%) +0.52
27 1985 1632 124.1 — — — — -84 — +161 45.1% -0.29 4–1 (80%) 3–6 (33%) +0.26 1980 1994 163.9 — — — — +45 +68 — 67.1% +0.98 18–7 (72%) 14–8 (64%) -3.93
28 1986 1565 124.1 — — — — -42 -60 +145 36.1% -0.99 2–5 (29%) 5–5 (50%) -1.65 1981 1759 156.3 — — — — +57 +193 — 51.2% +0.46 6–6 (50%) 2–9 (18%) -2.34
29 1987 1522 116.9 — — — — -7 — — 33.3% -1.19 0–3 (0%) 1–0 +0.32 1982 1799 154.8 — — — — +10 +98 — 51.3% +0.21 7–11 (39%) 5–6 (45%) -5.46
30 1988 1577 112.4 — — — — -79 — +139 40.0% -0.93 1–2 (33%) 5–1 (83%) -0.40 1983 1624 125.7 — — — — +49 +131 — 31.5% -1.04 2–6 (25%) 1–3 (25%) -1.75
31 1989 1536 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.83 — 0–1 +0.14 1984 1633 121.4 — — — — — +85 — 50.0% +0.08 1–2 (33%) 2–0 -0.31
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1616 120.3 — — — — +9 +95 — 43.5% -0.26 1–2 (33%) 1–0 -0.03
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1594 116.2 — — — — +38 +76 — 43.3% -1.00 0–5 (0%) — -0.58
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1575 95.8 -0.57 -1.98 0.778 42.9% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — +0.16
Career — 1730 126.5 — — — — -35 -25 +103 38.5% -0.79 19–20 (49%) 26–31 (46%) +1.57 — 2164 159.6 -0.57 -1.98 0.778 42.9% +7 +78 -303 59.0% +0.65 177–108 (62%) 106–88 (55%) -4.36

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.