H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ricardo Acuna vs Tim Wilkison H2H: 0-1
Tim Wilkison holds a 1–0 lead over Ricardo Acuna in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tim Wilkison leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Tim Wilkison won the 1986 Memphis second round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 68
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 66
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 1986* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R64 | Carpet | Tim Wilkison | 6-3 6-0 | Ricardo Acuna | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ricardo Acuna | #1,264 | #47 | 19 | 1,729 | 60 | 101 | 37.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tim Wilkison | #1,167 | #23 | 269 | 1,894 | 294 | 298 | 49.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ricardo Acuna | Tim Wilkison | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #114 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #54 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #95 | 1,684 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1979 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #312 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #71 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1980 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #151 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #61 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1981 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #151 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #88 | 1,678 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1982 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #100 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #39 | 1,765 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1983 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #91 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 36–28 | 56.2% | #44 | 1,807 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1984 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #152 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #29 | 1,771 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1985 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #57 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #55 | 1,729 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1986 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #171 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,672 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1987 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #199 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,599 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1988 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #163 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #210 | 1,540 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #530 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1178 | 1,522 | 0 | 6 |