H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Ricardo Mello vs Horacio Zeballos H2H: 1-0
Ricardo Mello holds a 1–0 lead over Horacio Zeballos in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ricardo Mello leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ricardo Mello won the 2010 Indian Wells Masters first round 2-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 45
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 41
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2010* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Ricardo Mello | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | Horacio Zeballos | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ricardo Mello | #1,018 | #50 | 738 | 1,773 | 52 | 87 | 37.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Horacio Zeballos | #841 | #39 | 1,027 | 1,876 | 87 | 131 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ricardo Mello | Horacio Zeballos | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2001 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #133 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2003 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #128 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2004 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #71 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2005 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #111 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #134 | 1,490 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #110 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #257 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #109 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #85 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #56 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2010 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #76 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #123 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2011 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #85 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #286 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #71 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1018 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #173 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |