H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Ricardo Mello vs Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo H2H: 2-0
Ricardo Mello holds a 2–0 lead over Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ricardo Mello leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ricardo Mello won the 2011 Indian Wells Masters first round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 45
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2011* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Ricardo Mello | 6-4 6-3 | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | Match data |
| Feb 3, 2011* | Santiago | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ricardo Mello | 6-4 6-7(5) 7-6(6) | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | Match data |
| May 28, 2002* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Q2 | Clay | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | 6-2 4-6 6-0 | Ricardo Mello | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ricardo Mello | #1,018 | #50 | 738 | 1,773 | 52 | 87 | 37.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | #1,153 | #50 | 826 | 1,704 | 68 | 133 | 33.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ricardo Mello | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2001 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #133 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2003 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #128 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2004 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #71 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #111 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #134 | 1,490 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #80 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #257 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #130 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #57 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2010 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #76 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2011 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #85 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #121 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #286 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1018 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #77 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #91 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #166 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #224 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |