H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Richard Fromberg vs Andrea Gaudenzi H2H: 2-2

Richard Fromberg and Andrea Gaudenzi are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Richard Fromberg leads 2–0 on clay, while Andrea Gaudenzi leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrea Gaudenzi won the 2002 Australian Open first round 1-6 6-0 7-5 6-3.

AUS Age 56 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2 2
4 main draw meetings
ITA Age 52 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 16, 2002* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Andrea Gaudenzi #52 1-6 6-0 7-5 6-3 Richard Fromberg #296 Match data
Sep 28, 1997* Bucharest ATP 250 F Clay Richard Fromberg #88 6-1 7-6(2) Andrea Gaudenzi #84 Match data
Mar 8, 1995* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Andrea Gaudenzi #19 2-6 6-2 7-6(2) Richard Fromberg #42 Match data
Jun 13, 1991* Florence ATP 250 R32 Clay Richard Fromberg #41 3-6 6-3 6-3 Andrea Gaudenzi #665 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Fromberg #997 #24 1,214 1,823 247 282 46.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Andrea Gaudenzi #1,441 #18 1,522 1,865 204 220 48.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Fromberg Andrea Gaudenzi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #861 1,489 0 0
17 1991 0–3 0.0% #632 1,456 0 0
18 1988 5–5 50.0% #103 1,550 0 0
19 1989 7–13 35.0% #126 1,548 0 0 1993 17–10 63.0% #60 1,670 0 0
20 1990 29–21 58.0% #32 1,662 0 2 1994 36–29 55.4% #24 1,773 0 0
21 1991 18–20 47.4% #95 1,643 0 3 1995 31–25 55.4% #22 1,680 0 0
22 1992 14–22 38.9% #83 1,638 0 3 1996 24–26 48.0% #55 1,654 0 0
23 1993 34–30 53.1% #40 1,680 0 3 1997 14–20 41.2% #57 1,640 0 0
24 1994 25–28 47.2% #58 1,695 0 3 1998 30–24 55.6% #44 1,677 0 1
25 1995 18–20 47.4% #85 1,673 0 3 1999 13–14 48.1% #84 1,645 0 1
26 1996 18–21 46.2% #76 1,633 0 3 2000 8–16 33.3% #101 1,592 0 1
27 1997 19–25 43.2% #77 1,671 0 4 2001 17–19 47.2% #54 1,693 0 3
28 1998 26–31 45.6% #40 1,598 0 4 2002 11–26 29.7% #120 1,534 0 3
29 1999 15–16 48.4% #78 1,666 0 4 2003 3–7 30.0% #293 1,533 0 3
30 2000 18–20 47.4% #84 1,633 0 4
31 2001 1–8 11.1% #309 1,502 0 4
32 2002 0–2 0.0% #727 1,486 0 4