H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Richard Fromberg vs Andrei Chesnokov H2H: 0-2
Andrei Chesnokov holds a 2–0 lead over Richard Fromberg in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrei Chesnokov leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrei Chesnokov won the 1994 Stuttgart Outdoor fourth round 4-6 7-6(1) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 1994* | Stuttgart Outdoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Andrei Chesnokov | 4-6 7-6(1) 7-5 | Richard Fromberg | Match data |
| Sep 28, 1991* | Brisbane | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Andrei Chesnokov | 6-4 6-4 | Richard Fromberg | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Fromberg | #997 | #24 | 1,214 | 1,823 | 247 | 282 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Andrei Chesnokov | #709 | #9 | 1,399 | 1,972 | 316 | 235 | 57.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richard Fromberg | Andrei Chesnokov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1988 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #126 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #32 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #36 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #52 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1992 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #83 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #14 | 1,884 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1993 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #40 | 1,680 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #22 | 1,863 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1994 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #58 | 1,695 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #12 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 1995 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #85 | 1,673 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,781 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 1996 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #30 | 1,726 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1997 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #77 | 1,671 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #27 | 1,749 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 1998 | 26–31 | 45.6% | #40 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,773 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 1999 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #78 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #89 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2000 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #84 | 1,633 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #85 | 1,585 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 2001 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #309 | 1,502 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,571 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #727 | 1,486 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #494 | 1,565 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #872 | 1,551 | 0 | 7 |