H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Richard Fromberg vs Carl Uwe Steeb H2H: 1-1
Richard Fromberg and Carl Uwe Steeb are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Richard Fromberg leads 1–0 on clay, while Carl Uwe Steeb leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Carl Uwe Steeb won the 1996 Adelaide third round 3-6 6-1 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 58
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 1996* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Carl Uwe Steeb | 3-6 6-1 7-6(4) | Richard Fromberg | Match data |
| Jul 20, 1994* | Stuttgart Outdoor | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Richard Fromberg | 6-4 6-1 | Carl Uwe Steeb | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Fromberg | #997 | #24 | 1,214 | 1,823 | 247 | 282 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Carl Uwe Steeb | #1,355 | #14 | 1,095 | 1,920 | 189 | 190 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richard Fromberg | Carl Uwe Steeb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1988 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #126 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #32 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #73 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #15 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1992 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #83 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1993 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #40 | 1,680 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1994 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #58 | 1,695 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #29 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1995 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #85 | 1,673 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #94 | 1,718 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1996 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #89 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1997 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #77 | 1,671 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #67 | 1,660 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1998 | 26–31 | 45.6% | #40 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #179 | 1,540 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1999 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #78 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2000 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #84 | 1,633 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2001 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #309 | 1,502 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #727 | 1,486 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |