H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Richard Fromberg vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 1-4

Cedric Pioline holds a 4–1 lead over Richard Fromberg in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Cedric Pioline leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Richard Fromberg won the 1999 Toulouse third round 7-6(10) 2-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Fromberg
AUS Age 56 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 30, 1999* Toulouse ATP 250 R32 Hard Richard Fromberg #87 7-6(10) 2-6 6-4 Cedric Pioline #16 Match data
Jun 17, 1999* Nottingham ATP 250 R32 Grass Cedric Pioline #52 6-7(3) 6-3 7-5 Richard Fromberg #75 Match data
Oct 15, 1998* Vienna ATP 250 R32 Carpet Cedric Pioline #16 6-3 7-6(7) Richard Fromberg #44 Match data
May 3, 1997* Prague ATP 250 QF Clay Cedric Pioline #41 6-4 4-6 6-2 Richard Fromberg #90 Match data
Oct 23, 1993* Lyon ATP 250 SF Carpet Cedric Pioline #10 6-3 6-7(2) 6-4 Richard Fromberg #43 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Fromberg #997 #24 1,214 1,823 247 282 46.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Fromberg Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1988 5–5 50.0% #103 1,550 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1989 7–13 35.0% #126 1,548 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1990 29–21 58.0% #32 1,662 0 2 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0
21 1991 18–20 47.4% #95 1,643 0 3 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1992 14–22 38.9% #83 1,638 0 3 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1993 34–30 53.1% #40 1,680 0 3 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0
24 1994 25–28 47.2% #58 1,695 0 3 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 1995 18–20 47.4% #85 1,673 0 3 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0
26 1996 18–21 46.2% #76 1,633 0 3 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0
27 1997 19–25 43.2% #77 1,671 0 4 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1
28 1998 26–31 45.6% #40 1,598 0 4 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2
29 1999 15–16 48.4% #78 1,666 0 4 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2
30 2000 18–20 47.4% #84 1,633 0 4 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3
31 2001 1–8 11.1% #309 1,502 0 4 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5
32 2002 0–2 0.0% #727 1,486 0 4 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5