H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Richard Fromberg vs Jakob Hlasek H2H: 1-1
Richard Fromberg and Jakob Hlasek are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jakob Hlasek leads 1–0 on clay, while Richard Fromberg leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Richard Fromberg won the 1993 Osaka third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 1993* | Osaka | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Richard Fromberg | 6-3 6-4 | Jakob Hlasek | Match data |
| May 5, 1988* | Munich | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jakob Hlasek | 1-6 6-2 7-6 | Richard Fromberg | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Fromberg | #997 | #24 | 1,214 | 1,823 | 247 | 282 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Jakob Hlasek | #583 | #7 | 1,308 | 2,062 | 389 | 300 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richard Fromberg | Jakob Hlasek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1988 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #227 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #126 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #32 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #33 | 1,784 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #32 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #83 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #23 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #40 | 1,680 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 44–14 | 75.9% | #8 | 2,050 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1994 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #58 | 1,695 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1995 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #85 | 1,673 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1996 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,869 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1997 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #77 | 1,671 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #36 | 1,806 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1998 | 26–31 | 45.6% | #40 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #71 | 1,713 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1999 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #78 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,676 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2000 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #84 | 1,633 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #35 | 1,783 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2001 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #309 | 1,502 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #74 | 1,751 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #727 | 1,486 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |