H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Richard Fromberg vs Jan Siemerink H2H: 1-1
Richard Fromberg and Jan Siemerink are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jan Siemerink leads 1–0 on carpet, while Richard Fromberg leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jan Siemerink won the 1995 Vienna third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 56
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 1995* | Vienna | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Jan Siemerink | 6-3 6-2 | Richard Fromberg | Match data |
| Jul 28, 1994* | Hilversum | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Richard Fromberg | 7-5 7-5 | Jan Siemerink | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Fromberg | #997 | #24 | 1,214 | 1,823 | 247 | 282 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Jan Siemerink | #987 | #14 | 1,863 | 1,908 | 261 | 260 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richard Fromberg | Jan Siemerink | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1988 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #126 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1990 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #32 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #135 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #26 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1992 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #83 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #57 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1993 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #40 | 1,680 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #53 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1994 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #58 | 1,695 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #81 | 1,685 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1995 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #85 | 1,673 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #21 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1996 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #15 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1997 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #77 | 1,671 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #78 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1998 | 26–31 | 45.6% | #40 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #19 | 1,809 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1999 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #78 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #88 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2000 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #84 | 1,633 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2001 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #309 | 1,502 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #127 | 1,564 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #727 | 1,486 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,532 | 0 | 4 |