H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Richard Fromberg vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 1-1

Richard Fromberg and Jeff Tarango are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Richard Fromberg won the 2000 Miami Open round of 128 7-6(5) 4-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Fromberg
AUS Age 56 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Richard Fromberg #63 7-6(5) 4-6 7-5 Jeff Tarango #75 Match data Mar 21, 2000* R128 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Jeff Tarango #75 6-4 6-7(4) 6-4 Richard Fromberg #87 Match data Oct 1, 1999* R16 Toulouse ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Richard Fromberg #997 #24 1,214 1,823 247 283 46.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,788 240 294 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Fromberg Jeff Tarango
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1988 5–5 50.0% #103 1,550 0 0 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0
19 1989 7–13 35.0% #126 1,548 0 0 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0
20 1990 29–21 58.0% #32 1,663 0 2 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0
21 1991 18–20 47.4% #95 1,643 0 3 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,607 0 0
22 1992 14–23 37.8% #83 1,636 0 3 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,613 0 0
23 1993 34–30 53.1% #40 1,681 0 3 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2
24 1994 25–28 47.2% #58 1,697 0 3 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2
25 1995 18–20 47.4% #85 1,671 0 3 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,655 0 2
26 1996 18–21 46.2% #76 1,633 0 3 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,654 0 2
27 1997 19–25 43.2% #77 1,673 0 4 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,619 0 2
28 1998 26–31 45.6% #40 1,597 0 4 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,693 0 2
29 1999 15–16 48.4% #78 1,666 0 4 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2
30 2000 18–20 47.4% #84 1,632 0 4 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2
31 2001 1–8 11.1% #309 1,502 0 4 2000 11–25 30.6% #112 1,517 0 2
32 2002 0–2 0.0% #727 1,486 0 4 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,447 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Richard Fromberg Jeff Tarango
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1987 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1989 7 11 18 38.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1990 11 9 20 55.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 1989 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1991 12 8 20 60.0% 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1990 7 10 17 41.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1992 7 10 17 41.2% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1991 11 14 25 44.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1993 14 12 26 53.8% 15 13 28 53.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1992 17 11 28 60.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
24 1994 4 7 11 36.4% 17 15 32 53.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1993 14 16 30 46.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 1995 7 8 15 46.7% 11 10 21 52.4% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1994 18 18 36 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
26 1996 4 7 11 36.4% 14 13 27 51.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1995 7 14 21 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 1997 5 7 12 41.7% 13 12 25 52.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 1996 8 7 15 53.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
28 1998 11 11 22 50.0% 14 14 28 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1997 20 13 33 60.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
29 1999 5 5 10 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1998 19 18 37 51.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
30 2000 11 8 19 57.9% 5 10 15 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1999 6 11 17 35.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
31 2001 1 4 5 20.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 2 14 16 12.5% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 2002 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 103 113 216 47.7% 123 124 247 49.8% 15 21 36 41.7% 6 25 31 19.4% — 146 167 313 46.6% 49 59 108 45.4% 14 27 41 34.1% 31 41 72 43.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 393/450 of Richard Fromberg's and 411/468 of Jeff Tarango's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Richard Fromberg Jeff Tarango
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 1991 29/38 5.1 2.9 56.9% 70.5% 47.5% 54.4% 46.4% 60.8% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1992 33/37 6.2 3.6 55.9% 70.4% 47.0% 62.4% 39.8% 60.1% 38.1% 1991 32/39 1.9 5.1 65.8% 64.8% 46.6% 56.0% 48.7% 58.5% 37.0%
23 1993 54/64 8.5 3.9 58.0% 73.3% 48.4% 60.4% 40.6% 62.8% 34.6% 1992 47/52 3.5 3.5 63.1% 67.5% 47.8% 56.6% 42.3% 60.3% 38.7%
24 1994 49/53 8.7 4.6 58.9% 73.2% 49.4% 57.8% 42.1% 63.4% 35.5% 1993 43/50 3.7 4.6 56.6% 68.4% 47.0% 59.2% 45.1% 59.1% 38.5%
25 1995 33/38 7.2 2.8 56.7% 72.8% 49.6% 60.0% 42.5% 62.9% 36.5% 1994 40/50 3.6 2.2 62.1% 65.8% 51.8% 56.4% 46.6% 60.6% 39.0%
26 1996 34/39 7.7 3.0 59.8% 74.6% 48.7% 47.3% 42.4% 64.1% 38.0% 1995 38/42 4.2 3.7 62.9% 70.3% 49.3% 54.4% 44.8% 62.3% 37.0%
27 1997 40/44 8.7 5.1 59.9% 75.9% 47.1% 58.1% 38.3% 64.5% 36.3% 1996 28/32 5.2 3.2 61.9% 68.0% 50.2% 54.3% 39.3% 61.4% 38.0%
28 1998 50/57 11.1 3.6 59.7% 76.6% 49.0% 60.6% 41.3% 65.5% 37.5% 1997 54/60 3.8 3.5 62.3% 69.2% 51.5% 52.2% 45.0% 62.3% 38.9%
29 1999 26/31 11.0 3.9 59.1% 72.8% 49.8% 61.0% 30.5% 63.2% 34.0% 1998 47/53 4.0 4.2 57.7% 67.9% 52.0% 51.3% 46.8% 61.1% 40.1%
30 2000 34/38 9.8 3.4 59.6% 72.4% 50.7% 51.9% 49.1% 63.8% 36.9% 1999 42/45 4.9 4.1 60.6% 67.1% 46.1% 61.0% 43.2% 58.9% 38.4%
31 2001 9/9 8.0 3.6 58.5% 69.4% 41.2% 45.9% 44.8% 57.6% 32.7% 2000 33/36 4.6 5.3 58.1% 68.9% 47.5% 56.9% 42.2% 60.1% 36.0%
32 2002 2/2 4.0 6.0 60.9% 71.8% 34.2% 47.7% 22.5% 57.0% 33.6% 2001 7/9 3.3 2.1 62.4% 61.8% 52.7% 53.7% 51.2% 58.4% 34.3%
Career — 393/530 8.5 3.8 58.6% 73.4% 48.5% 57.4% 41.4% 63.1% 36.6% — 411/534 3.9 3.9 61.0% 67.8% 49.2% 55.7% 44.6% 60.5% 38.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Richard Fromberg Jeff Tarango
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1988 1551 111.4 — — — — +19 — — 46.4% -0.46 3–2 (60%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.29 1987 1508 108.5 — — — — +34 — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 1–1 — -0.19
19 1989 1548 118.1 — — — — +34 — — 36.0% -0.76 2–6 (25%) 4–6 (40%) — +0.22 1988 1598 124.9 — — — — +37 — — 51.4% -0.26 4–3 (57%) 4–0 (100%) — -0.05
20 1990 1663 138.3 — — — — -70 +70 -25 55.7% +0.45 11–12 (48%) 16–14 (53%) — +1.40 1989 1648 118.8 — — — — +7 — -102 46.4% -0.39 3–2 (60%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.12
21 1991 1643 133.9 +0.28 +1.30 1.064 51.0% +14 +47 — 48.4% -0.23 5–5 (50%) 5–4 (56%) — +0.91 1990 1607 120.5 — — — — +6 -46 -69 42.0% -0.54 4–6 (40%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.35
22 1992 1637 132.1 -0.58 -0.50 0.954 49.4% +19 +5 — 44.1% -0.28 4–8 (33%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.04 1991 1613 132.3 -1.93 -1.26 0.892 48.2% +24 -37 — 41.8% -0.47 8–7 (53%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.07
23 1993 1682 133.8 +1.16 -2.63 0.932 49.1% +27 -9 -121 50.3% +0.05 15–9 (63%) 21–19 (53%) — +0.53 1992 1694 139.2 -0.84 +0.16 0.974 49.7% +28 -96 -139 50.4% +0.10 15–6 (71%) 10–14 (42%) — -1.21
24 1994 1698 136.2 +1.93 -2.65 0.970 49.9% -30 +46 -86 47.6% -0.14 10–10 (50%) 16–17 (48%) — -1.37 1993 1670 136.1 -1.01 -0.06 0.942 49.0% +18 -8 — 45.9% -0.28 12–6 (67%) 2–6 (25%) — -1.60
25 1995 1672 142.3 +1.50 -1.49 0.983 49.6% -41 +85 — 49.4% -0.08 3–5 (38%) 6–10 (38%) — -0.88 1994 1655 132.9 -1.13 +0.92 0.992 50.0% +24 -22 — 46.1% -0.03 6–7 (46%) 5–6 (45%) — +1.47
26 1996 1633 136.1 +2.11 -0.57 1.060 50.8% +20 +51 — 47.4% -0.02 6–7 (46%) 4–7 (36%) — -1.93 1995 1654 144.2 +0.56 -0.03 0.982 49.5% +7 -14 -104 43.3% -0.18 4–6 (40%) 7–10 (41%) — -1.34
27 1997 1674 134.6 +2.54 -1.42 1.022 50.5% -72 +76 -91 44.2% -0.03 7–8 (47%) 9–17 (35%) — -1.35 1996 1620 125.4 -0.16 +0.21 0.984 49.7% +74 -59 — 44.4% -0.35 4–7 (36%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.93
28 1998 1598 134.8 +3.39 -0.75 1.089 51.6% -4 +127 -33 47.4% +0.18 10–14 (42%) 8–24 (25%) — +1.54 1997 1694 143.8 +0.74 +1.18 1.031 50.6% +30 -59 -135 52.9% +0.29 7–11 (39%) 11–12 (48%) — -1.45
29 1999 1667 126.4 +1.31 -2.30 0.922 49.0% -31 +33 -90 49.4% -0.32 6–6 (50%) 12–3 (80%) — -0.28 1998 1660 141.3 -0.44 +2.15 1.031 50.5% +49 -71 -90 47.8% -0.04 7–14 (33%) 7–12 (37%) — +0.03
30 2000 1633 131.8 +1.64 -0.83 1.022 50.3% +93 -40 -74 49.1% +0.05 9–11 (45%) 12–11 (52%) — +0.27 1999 1685 132.2 -2.40 -0.03 0.934 48.9% +15 -75 -110 46.4% -0.07 7–6 (54%) 6–6 (50%) — +1.16
31 2001 1502 115.9 -0.76 -1.82 0.772 45.4% +142 +20 — 18.2% -1.55 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.43 2000 1517 123.9 -0.88 -1.79 0.903 48.4% -8 +82 +47 38.3% -0.57 3–10 (23%) 6–12 (33%) — -0.28
32 2002 1486 104.4 +0.20 -1.39 0.783 45.5% — — — 28.6% -2.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.18 2001 1453 110.6 -0.42 -1.74 0.824 46.7% +20 — — 25.0% -1.60 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.01
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1447 103.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.06
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1455 101.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1823 139.4 +1.58 -1.32 0.994 50.0% +3 +49 -67 47.5% -0.08 92–106 (46%) 124–143 (46%) 97.7 -0.44 — 1788 140.0 -0.70 +0.24 0.968 49.5% +26 -27 -95 45.8% -0.19 84–94 (47%) 79–102 (44%) 95.5 -0.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.