H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Richard Fromberg vs Jim Grabb H2H: 0-1

Jim Grabb holds a 1–0 lead over Richard Fromberg in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jim Grabb leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jim Grabb won the 1989 Singapore round of 16 6-7 6-3 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Fromberg
AUS Age 56 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Jim Grabb
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jim Grabb #107 6-7 6-3 7-6 Richard Fromberg #129 Match data Apr 28, 1989* R16 Singapore ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Richard Fromberg #997 #24 1,214 1,823 247 283 46.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Jim Grabb #927 #24 760 1,828 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Fromberg Jim Grabb
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1988 5–5 50.0% #103 1,550 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1989 7–13 35.0% #126 1,548 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1990 29–21 58.0% #32 1,663 0 2 — — — — — — —
21 1991 18–20 47.4% #95 1,643 0 3 1985 4–4 50.0% #251 1,560 0 0
22 1992 14–23 37.8% #83 1,636 0 3 1986 7–6 53.8% #94 1,636 0 0
23 1993 34–30 53.1% #40 1,681 0 3 1987 20–18 52.6% #66 1,687 0 1
24 1994 25–28 47.2% #58 1,697 0 3 1988 17–23 42.5% #91 1,562 0 1
25 1995 18–20 47.4% #85 1,671 0 3 1989 27–20 57.4% #35 1,767 0 1
26 1996 18–21 46.2% #76 1,633 0 3 1990 16–18 47.1% #72 1,688 0 1
27 1997 19–25 43.2% #77 1,673 0 4 1991 19–23 45.2% #87 1,680 0 1
28 1998 26–31 45.6% #40 1,597 0 4 1992 31–24 56.4% #55 1,748 0 2
29 1999 15–16 48.4% #78 1,666 0 4 1993 6–9 40.0% #197 1,690 0 2
30 2000 18–20 47.4% #84 1,632 0 4 1994 18–20 47.4% #68 1,670 0 2
31 2001 1–8 11.1% #309 1,502 0 4 1995 6–17 26.1% #207 1,545 0 2
32 2002 0–2 0.0% #727 1,486 0 4 1996 6–10 37.5% #199 1,564 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 1997 2–7 22.2% #342 1,516 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Richard Fromberg Jim Grabb
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1989 7 11 18 38.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1990 11 9 20 55.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1991 12 8 20 60.0% 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1985 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1992 7 10 17 41.2% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1986 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1993 14 12 26 53.8% 15 13 28 53.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1987 14 9 23 60.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2%
24 1994 4 7 11 36.4% 17 15 32 53.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1988 10 14 24 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
25 1995 7 8 15 46.7% 11 10 21 52.4% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 25 14 39 64.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 1996 4 7 11 36.4% 14 13 27 51.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1990 10 7 17 58.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
27 1997 5 7 12 41.7% 13 12 25 52.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 1991 13 13 26 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
28 1998 11 11 22 50.0% 14 14 28 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1992 16 15 31 51.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6%
29 1999 5 5 10 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1993 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2000 11 8 19 57.9% 5 10 15 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1994 14 12 26 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
31 2001 1 4 5 20.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1995 5 14 19 26.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
32 2002 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 103 113 216 47.7% 123 124 247 49.8% 15 21 36 41.7% 6 25 31 19.4% — 126 125 251 50.2% 3 13 16 18.8% 10 20 30 33.3% 40 41 81 49.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 393/450 of Richard Fromberg's and 169/198 of Jim Grabb's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Richard Fromberg Jim Grabb
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 1991 29/38 5.1 2.9 56.9% 70.5% 47.5% 54.4% 46.4% 60.8% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1992 33/37 6.2 3.6 55.9% 70.4% 47.0% 62.4% 39.8% 60.1% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1993 54/64 8.5 3.9 58.0% 73.3% 48.4% 60.4% 40.6% 62.8% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1994 49/53 8.7 4.6 58.9% 73.2% 49.4% 57.8% 42.1% 63.4% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1995 33/38 7.2 2.8 56.7% 72.8% 49.6% 60.0% 42.5% 62.9% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1996 34/39 7.7 3.0 59.8% 74.6% 48.7% 47.3% 42.4% 64.1% 38.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1997 40/44 8.7 5.1 59.9% 75.9% 47.1% 58.1% 38.3% 64.5% 36.3% 1991 37/42 7.0 4.0 64.9% 72.2% 48.6% 59.8% 37.6% 64.1% 36.3%
28 1998 50/57 11.1 3.6 59.7% 76.6% 49.0% 60.6% 41.3% 65.5% 37.5% 1992 50/55 6.4 3.1 64.6% 75.8% 47.8% 54.4% 35.0% 66.0% 35.6%
29 1999 26/31 11.0 3.9 59.1% 72.8% 49.8% 61.0% 30.5% 63.2% 34.0% 1993 13/15 5.1 3.0 70.6% 65.7% 48.5% 60.1% 52.2% 59.9% 35.2%
30 2000 34/38 9.8 3.4 59.6% 72.4% 50.7% 51.9% 49.1% 63.8% 36.9% 1994 33/38 5.2 3.0 68.5% 69.1% 45.9% 59.0% 49.0% 61.9% 35.7%
31 2001 9/9 8.0 3.6 58.5% 69.4% 41.2% 45.9% 44.8% 57.6% 32.7% 1995 20/23 5.7 2.9 64.8% 68.9% 47.3% 65.1% 27.2% 61.3% 32.8%
32 2002 2/2 4.0 6.0 60.9% 71.8% 34.2% 47.7% 22.5% 57.0% 33.6% 1996 10/16 7.1 5.5 65.1% 74.5% 44.0% 58.1% 52.2% 63.5% 33.7%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 6/9 4.3 6.5 63.9% 71.6% 34.5% 48.0% 42.7% 58.1% 32.5%
Career — 393/530 8.5 3.8 58.6% 73.4% 48.5% 57.4% 41.4% 63.1% 36.6% — 169/378 6.1 3.5 65.9% 71.9% 46.9% 58.2% 40.0% 63.3% 35.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Richard Fromberg Jim Grabb
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1988 1551 111.4 — — — — +19 — — 46.4% -0.46 3–2 (60%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1989 1548 118.1 — — — — +34 — — 36.0% -0.76 2–6 (25%) 4–6 (40%) — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1990 1663 138.3 — — — — -70 +70 -25 55.7% +0.45 11–12 (48%) 16–14 (53%) — +1.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1991 1643 133.9 +0.28 +1.30 1.064 51.0% +14 +47 — 48.4% -0.23 5–5 (50%) 5–4 (56%) — +0.91 1985 1560 123.7 — — — — +46 — — 47.6% -0.24 1–1 0–2 — +0.16
22 1992 1637 132.1 -0.58 -0.50 0.954 49.4% +19 +5 — 44.1% -0.28 4–8 (33%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.04 1986 1636 129.6 — — — — +34 — — 50.0% +0.40 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.05
23 1993 1682 133.8 +1.16 -2.63 0.932 49.1% +27 -9 -121 50.3% +0.05 15–9 (63%) 21–19 (53%) — +0.53 1987 1688 137.5 — — — — +49 — — 48.8% +0.04 4–2 (67%) 10–2 (83%) — +1.31
24 1994 1698 136.2 +1.93 -2.65 0.970 49.9% -30 +46 -86 47.6% -0.14 10–10 (50%) 16–17 (48%) — -1.37 1988 1562 123.6 — — — — +13 -58 -17 45.0% -0.28 6–6 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.31
25 1995 1672 142.3 +1.50 -1.49 0.983 49.6% -41 +85 — 49.4% -0.08 3–5 (38%) 6–10 (38%) — -0.88 1989 1768 139.4 — — — — +19 — — 56.7% +0.35 6–9 (40%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.18
26 1996 1633 136.1 +2.11 -0.57 1.060 50.8% +20 +51 — 47.4% -0.02 6–7 (46%) 4–7 (36%) — -1.93 1990 1689 132.1 — — — — +29 -250 -88 48.2% -0.14 5–5 (50%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.10
27 1997 1674 134.6 +2.54 -1.42 1.022 50.5% -72 +76 -91 44.2% -0.03 7–8 (47%) 9–17 (35%) — -1.35 1991 1681 136.8 +1.98 -1.92 1.009 50.2% +35 — -107 51.3% +0.05 7–17 (29%) 9–10 (47%) — +0.72
28 1998 1598 134.8 +3.39 -0.75 1.089 51.6% -4 +127 -33 47.4% +0.18 10–14 (42%) 8–24 (25%) — +1.54 1992 1749 141.9 +3.85 -1.34 1.048 50.4% +32 -275 -178 52.2% +0.19 11–7 (61%) 11–11 (50%) — +1.42
29 1999 1667 126.4 +1.31 -2.30 0.922 49.0% -31 +33 -90 49.4% -0.32 6–6 (50%) 12–3 (80%) — -0.28 1993 1691 122.3 -0.49 -1.37 0.878 47.6% +9 — — 45.9% -0.22 2–3 (40%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.36
30 2000 1633 131.8 +1.64 -0.83 1.022 50.3% +93 -40 -74 49.1% +0.05 9–11 (45%) 12–11 (52%) — +0.27 1994 1670 136.2 +0.52 -2.08 0.937 48.9% +50 — -139 50.0% +0.04 7–8 (47%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.09
31 2001 1502 115.9 -0.76 -1.82 0.772 45.4% +142 +20 — 18.2% -1.55 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.43 1995 1546 127.6 -0.66 -2.43 0.847 47.4% +34 — — 33.3% -1.11 2–5 (29%) 4–9 (31%) — -1.25
32 2002 1486 104.4 +0.20 -1.39 0.783 45.5% — — — 28.6% -2.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.18 1996 1565 120.0 +0.58 -1.86 0.923 48.7% +2 — — 41.9% -0.53 3–3 (50%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.17
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1516 104.9 -2.13 -1.64 0.777 45.3% +9 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.17
Career — 1823 139.4 +1.58 -1.32 0.994 50.0% +3 +49 -67 47.5% -0.08 92–106 (46%) 124–143 (46%) 97.7 -0.44 — 1829 140.2 +1.52 -1.78 0.959 49.2% +30 -207 -101 48.5% -0.08 58–69 (46%) 75–85 (47%) 96.6 +0.43

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.