H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Richard Fromberg vs Jonathan Stark H2H: 2-1
Richard Fromberg holds a 2–1 lead over Jonathan Stark in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Richard Fromberg leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Jonathan Stark leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Richard Fromberg won the 2000 Delray Beach third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2000* | Delray Beach | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Richard Fromberg | 6-4 6-2 | Jonathan Stark | Match data |
| Jan 5, 1995* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Richard Fromberg | 6-4 6-2 | Jonathan Stark | Match data |
| May 13, 1993* | Coral Springs | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jonathan Stark | 6-0 6-4 | Richard Fromberg | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Fromberg | #997 | #24 | 1,214 | 1,823 | 247 | 282 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Jonathan Stark | #829 | #36 | 913 | 1,801 | 135 | 150 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richard Fromberg | Jonathan Stark | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #403 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1988 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #126 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1007 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #32 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #243 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #83 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #38 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1993 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #40 | 1,680 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #65 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1994 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #58 | 1,695 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #100 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1995 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #85 | 1,673 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #68 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1996 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #96 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1997 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #77 | 1,671 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #266 | 1,576 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1998 | 26–31 | 45.6% | #40 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #300 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1999 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #78 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #512 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2000 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #84 | 1,633 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,556 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2001 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #309 | 1,502 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #727 | 1,486 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |