H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Richard Fromberg vs Marc Rosset H2H: 3-1
Richard Fromberg holds a 3–1 lead over Marc Rosset in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Richard Fromberg leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marc Rosset won the 1995 Roland Garros first round 7-5 5-7 7-5 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 55
Right-Handed
201 cm / 6'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 1995* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Marc Rosset | 7-5 5-7 7-5 7-6(5) | Richard Fromberg | Match data |
| Jan 12, 1995* | Sydney Outdoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Richard Fromberg | 6-4 6-4 | Marc Rosset | Match data |
| Jul 19, 1990* | Stuttgart Outdoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Richard Fromberg | 6-1 6-3 | Marc Rosset | Match data |
| May 27, 1990* | Bologna | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Richard Fromberg | 4-6 6-4 7-6 | Marc Rosset | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Fromberg | #997 | #24 | 1,214 | 1,823 | 247 | 282 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Marc Rosset | #1,490 | #9 | 2,069 | 1,950 | 398 | 334 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richard Fromberg | Marc Rosset | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #474 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1988 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 7–2 | 77.8% | #45 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1989 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #126 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #22 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1990 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #32 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #60 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1991 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #35 | 1,826 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1992 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #83 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #16 | 1,922 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1993 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #40 | 1,680 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #14 | 1,925 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1994 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #58 | 1,695 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #15 | 1,814 | 0 | 10 |
| 25 | 1995 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #85 | 1,673 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #22 | 1,771 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1996 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 32–31 | 50.8% | #31 | 1,630 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 1997 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #77 | 1,671 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,749 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | 1998 | 26–31 | 45.6% | #40 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #45 | 1,658 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 1999 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #78 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #28 | 1,723 | 0 | 14 |
| 30 | 2000 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #84 | 1,633 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #119 | 1,601 | 0 | 14 |
| 31 | 2001 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #309 | 1,502 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,597 | 0 | 14 |
| 32 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #727 | 1,486 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,586 | 0 | 14 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #214 | 1,546 | 0 | 14 |