H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Richard Fromberg vs Martin Jaite H2H: 1-0
Richard Fromberg holds a 1–0 lead over Martin Jaite in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Richard Fromberg leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Richard Fromberg won the 1991 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 61
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 1991* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Richard Fromberg | 6-3 6-2 | Martin Jaite | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Fromberg | #997 | #24 | 1,214 | 1,823 | 247 | 282 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Martin Jaite | #1,214 | #10 | 1,226 | 1,965 | 272 | 157 | 63.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richard Fromberg | Martin Jaite | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1988 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #285 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #126 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #56 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #32 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #20 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1991 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #17 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1992 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #83 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 43–17 | 71.7% | #14 | 1,890 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1993 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #40 | 1,680 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #54 | 1,731 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1994 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #58 | 1,695 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 46–14 | 76.7% | #11 | 1,947 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1995 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #85 | 1,673 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #36 | 1,767 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 1996 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #46 | 1,706 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 1997 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #77 | 1,671 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #120 | 1,678 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 1998 | 26–31 | 45.6% | #40 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #245 | 1,601 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 1999 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #78 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2000 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #84 | 1,633 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2001 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #309 | 1,502 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #727 | 1,486 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |