H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Richard Fromberg vs Mats Wilander H2H: 3-2

Richard Fromberg holds a 3–2 lead over Mats Wilander in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Mats Wilander leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Richard Fromberg leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Richard Fromberg won the 1996 Atlanta third round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Fromberg
AUS Age 56 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Mats Wilander
SWE Age 61 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 2, 1996* Atlanta ATP 250 R32 Clay Richard Fromberg #124 6-3 6-4 Mats Wilander #80 Match data
Aug 25, 1994* Schenectady ATP 250 R32 Hard Mats Wilander #122 6-1 4-6 6-3 Richard Fromberg #43 Match data
Jan 6, 1994* Adelaide ATP 250 R32 Hard Richard Fromberg #40 6-3 4-6 6-2 Mats Wilander #330 Match data
Apr 30, 1993* Atlanta ATP 250 R16 Clay Richard Fromberg #72 6-3 6-1 Mats Wilander #1094 Match data
Jan 17, 1990* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Mats Wilander #15 7-6 7-5 7-5 Richard Fromberg #88 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Fromberg #997 #24 1,214 1,823 247 282 46.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Mats Wilander #1,354 #1 1,075 2,262 526 203 72.2% 7 6 0 0 20 33

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Fromberg Mats Wilander
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1980 1–4 20.0% #283 1,496 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1981 13–10 56.5% #73 1,662 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1982 56–16 77.8% #8 2,020 1 4
18 1988 5–5 50.0% #103 1,550 0 0 1983 71–11 86.6% #4 2,246 2 13
19 1989 7–13 35.0% #126 1,548 0 0 1984 49–12 80.3% #4 2,177 3 16
20 1990 29–21 58.0% #32 1,662 0 2 1985 65–17 79.3% #3 2,108 4 19
21 1991 18–20 47.4% #95 1,643 0 3 1986 46–13 78.0% #3 2,056 4 21
22 1992 14–22 38.9% #83 1,638 0 3 1987 65–17 79.3% #3 2,082 4 26
23 1993 34–30 53.1% #40 1,680 0 3 1988 51–9 85.0% #1 2,152 7 32
24 1994 25–28 47.2% #58 1,695 0 3 1989 31–15 67.4% #12 1,922 7 32
25 1995 18–20 47.4% #85 1,673 0 3 1990 21–13 61.8% #41 1,894 7 33
26 1996 18–21 46.2% #76 1,633 0 3 1991 9–10 47.4% #159 1,767 7 33
27 1997 19–25 43.2% #77 1,671 0 4 — — — — — — —
28 1998 26–31 45.6% #40 1,598 0 4 1993 3–7 30.0% #330 1,695 7 33
29 1999 15–16 48.4% #78 1,666 0 4 1994 17–20 45.9% #129 1,652 7 33
30 2000 18–20 47.4% #84 1,633 0 4 1995 21–18 53.8% #46 1,766 7 33
31 2001 1–8 11.1% #309 1,502 0 4 1996 7–11 38.9% #196 1,679 7 33
32 2002 0–2 0.0% #727 1,486 0 4 — — — — — — —