H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Richard Fromberg vs Michael Stich H2H: 0-3
Michael Stich holds a 3–0 lead over Richard Fromberg in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Michael Stich leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Michael Stich won the 1997 St. Petersburg third round 4-6 7-5 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 1997* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Michael Stich | 4-6 7-5 7-6(7) | Richard Fromberg | Match data |
| May 30, 1993* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Michael Stich | 6-4 6-4 6-4 | Richard Fromberg | Match data |
| Apr 11, 1990* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Michael Stich | 4-6 7-6 7-6 | Richard Fromberg | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Fromberg | #997 | #24 | 1,214 | 1,823 | 247 | 282 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Michael Stich | #116 | #2 | 3,445 | 2,119 | 350 | 162 | 68.4% | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 18 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richard Fromberg | Michael Stich | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1988 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #126 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1990 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #32 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #100 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #42 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1992 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #83 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 68–23 | 74.7% | #4 | 1,989 | 1 | 5 |
| 23 | 1993 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #40 | 1,680 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #15 | 2,016 | 1 | 7 |
| 24 | 1994 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #58 | 1,695 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 67–19 | 77.9% | #2 | 2,082 | 1 | 13 |
| 25 | 1995 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #85 | 1,673 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #9 | 1,925 | 1 | 16 |
| 26 | 1996 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 39–18 | 68.4% | #12 | 1,895 | 1 | 17 |
| 27 | 1997 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #77 | 1,671 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,828 | 1 | 18 |
| 28 | 1998 | 26–31 | 45.6% | #40 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #64 | 1,842 | 1 | 18 |
| 29 | 1999 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #78 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2000 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #84 | 1,633 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2001 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #309 | 1,502 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #727 | 1,486 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |