H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Richard Fromberg vs Nicolas Kiefer H2H: 2-0

Richard Fromberg holds a 2–0 lead over Nicolas Kiefer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Richard Fromberg leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Richard Fromberg won the 2000 Miami Open round of 64 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Fromberg
AUS Age 56 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Nicolas Kiefer
GER Age 49 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Richard Fromberg #63 6-4 6-4 Nicolas Kiefer #4 Match data Mar 22, 2000* R64 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Richard Fromberg #36 2-6 6-4 6-4 Nicolas Kiefer #21 Match data Jun 11, 1998* R32 Halle Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Richard Fromberg #997 #24 1,214 1,823 247 283 46.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Nicolas Kiefer #720 #4 2,447 1,995 347 255 57.6% 0 0 0 1 5 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Fromberg Nicolas Kiefer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1995 3–3 50.0% #206 1,527 0 0
18 1988 5–5 50.0% #103 1,550 0 0 1996 7–9 43.8% #128 1,563 0 0
19 1989 7–13 35.0% #126 1,548 0 0 1997 26–16 61.9% #32 1,799 0 1
20 1990 29–21 58.0% #32 1,663 0 2 1998 31–25 55.4% #35 1,792 0 1
21 1991 18–20 47.4% #95 1,643 0 3 1999 53–21 71.6% #6 1,922 0 4
22 1992 14–23 37.8% #83 1,636 0 3 2000 30–16 65.2% #20 1,900 0 6
23 1993 34–30 53.1% #40 1,681 0 3 2001 26–25 51.0% #42 1,763 0 6
24 1994 25–28 47.2% #58 1,697 0 3 2002 19–24 44.2% #72 1,717 0 6
25 1995 18–20 47.4% #85 1,671 0 3 2003 19–17 52.8% #58 1,727 0 6
26 1996 18–21 46.2% #76 1,633 0 3 2004 34–20 63.0% #21 1,886 0 6
27 1997 19–25 43.2% #77 1,673 0 4 2005 31–22 58.5% #22 1,862 0 6
28 1998 26–31 45.6% #40 1,597 0 4 2006 14–8 63.6% #48 1,863 0 6
29 1999 15–16 48.4% #78 1,666 0 4 2007 19–12 61.3% #49 1,906 0 6
30 2000 18–20 47.4% #84 1,632 0 4 2008 22–17 56.4% #38 1,889 0 6
31 2001 1–8 11.1% #309 1,502 0 4 2009 12–16 42.9% #116 1,762 0 6
32 2002 0–2 0.0% #727 1,486 0 4 2010 1–3 25.0% #722 1,722 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Richard Fromberg Nicolas Kiefer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
18 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
19 1989 7 11 18 38.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1997 7 5 12 58.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 2 7 71.4% 11 5 16 68.8%
20 1990 11 9 20 55.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 1998 24 15 39 61.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1991 12 8 20 60.0% 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1999 41 15 56 73.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
22 1992 7 10 17 41.2% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2000 27 11 38 71.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 1993 14 12 26 53.8% 15 13 28 53.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2001 11 13 24 45.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
24 1994 4 7 11 36.4% 17 15 32 53.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2002 10 15 25 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1995 7 8 15 46.7% 11 10 21 52.4% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2003 14 11 25 56.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
26 1996 4 7 11 36.4% 14 13 27 51.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 30 14 44 68.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 1997 5 7 12 41.7% 13 12 25 52.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 2005 15 13 28 53.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7%
28 1998 11 11 22 50.0% 14 14 28 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2006 8 4 12 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — —
29 1999 5 5 10 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2007 17 9 26 65.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
30 2000 11 8 19 57.9% 5 10 15 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2008 12 11 23 52.2% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
31 2001 1 4 5 20.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 4 7 11 36.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 2002 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
Career — 103 113 216 47.7% 123 124 247 49.8% 15 21 36 41.7% 6 25 31 19.4% — 221 145 366 60.4% 47 55 102 46.1% 44 30 74 59.5% 35 25 60 58.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 393/450 of Richard Fromberg's and 537/601 of Nicolas Kiefer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Richard Fromberg Nicolas Kiefer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 6/6 4.7 2.3 61.5% 72.6% 51.3% 62.7% 44.1% 64.8% 36.3%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 11/16 6.1 2.5 52.2% 76.6% 47.8% 53.2% 49.7% 62.7% 39.8%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 37/42 7.9 3.5 55.2% 77.0% 48.3% 60.5% 52.5% 64.1% 36.7%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 49/56 6.2 4.7 53.7% 74.8% 47.8% 55.1% 44.4% 62.5% 39.0%
21 1991 29/38 5.1 2.9 56.9% 70.5% 47.5% 54.4% 46.4% 60.8% 41.7% 1999 56/74 6.6 4.3 51.5% 75.7% 53.2% 61.8% 43.5% 64.7% 40.4%
22 1992 33/37 6.2 3.6 55.9% 70.4% 47.0% 62.4% 39.8% 60.1% 38.1% 2000 38/46 6.4 4.3 52.7% 74.9% 52.3% 61.7% 48.3% 64.3% 40.1%
23 1993 54/64 8.5 3.9 58.0% 73.3% 48.4% 60.4% 40.6% 62.8% 34.6% 2001 44/51 6.3 4.1 50.3% 71.1% 48.8% 54.0% 50.7% 60.0% 40.0%
24 1994 49/53 8.7 4.6 58.9% 73.2% 49.4% 57.8% 42.1% 63.4% 35.5% 2002 40/43 6.2 4.5 52.6% 74.1% 47.8% 58.8% 50.7% 61.5% 37.6%
25 1995 33/38 7.2 2.8 56.7% 72.8% 49.6% 60.0% 42.5% 62.9% 36.5% 2003 36/36 6.5 3.8 50.8% 73.1% 49.9% 58.1% 44.7% 61.8% 37.4%
26 1996 34/39 7.7 3.0 59.8% 74.6% 48.7% 47.3% 42.4% 64.1% 38.0% 2004 51/54 7.3 3.8 54.9% 77.8% 48.4% 61.1% 41.4% 64.5% 38.7%
27 1997 40/44 8.7 5.1 59.9% 75.9% 47.1% 58.1% 38.3% 64.5% 36.3% 2005 52/53 7.6 3.8 53.4% 74.2% 51.4% 56.4% 51.3% 63.6% 40.9%
28 1998 50/57 11.1 3.6 59.7% 76.6% 49.0% 60.6% 41.3% 65.5% 37.5% 2006 21/22 7.4 4.0 51.7% 72.0% 50.1% 59.5% 43.3% 61.3% 40.2%
29 1999 26/31 11.0 3.9 59.1% 72.8% 49.8% 61.0% 30.5% 63.2% 34.0% 2007 30/31 6.7 2.5 57.0% 79.9% 51.6% 64.6% 33.9% 67.8% 38.1%
30 2000 34/38 9.8 3.4 59.6% 72.4% 50.7% 51.9% 49.1% 63.8% 36.9% 2008 34/39 7.2 2.4 53.6% 76.3% 51.9% 55.4% 44.9% 64.9% 39.6%
31 2001 9/9 8.0 3.6 58.5% 69.4% 41.2% 45.9% 44.8% 57.6% 32.7% 2009 28/28 7.7 3.9 52.0% 75.0% 47.3% 62.9% 45.8% 61.9% 35.4%
32 2002 2/2 4.0 6.0 60.9% 71.8% 34.2% 47.7% 22.5% 57.0% 33.6% 2010 4/4 11.3 6.5 51.8% 77.7% 47.3% 55.7% 31.0% 63.0% 28.6%
Career — 393/530 8.5 3.8 58.6% 73.4% 48.5% 57.4% 41.4% 63.1% 36.6% — 537/602 6.9 3.8 53.1% 75.1% 49.9% 58.9% 46.0% 63.3% 38.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Richard Fromberg Nicolas Kiefer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1489 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.05
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1528 117.0 +1.19 -1.22 1.032 51.3% +26 — — 50.0% 0.00 1–1 — — +0.08
18 1988 1551 111.4 — — — — +19 — — 46.4% -0.46 3–2 (60%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.29 1996 1563 122.9 +0.33 +1.12 1.067 50.9% +8 -24 — 44.1% +0.09 0–1 2–3 (40%) — +0.80
19 1989 1548 118.1 — — — — +34 — — 36.0% -0.76 2–6 (25%) 4–6 (40%) — +0.22 1997 1799 139.8 +1.52 -0.54 1.021 50.8% -25 -229 -48 55.6% +0.30 14–3 (82%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.64
20 1990 1663 138.3 — — — — -70 +70 -25 55.7% +0.45 11–12 (48%) 16–14 (53%) — +1.40 1998 1792 151.1 +0.77 +1.69 1.039 50.9% +29 -161 -60 55.6% +0.37 10–11 (48%) 12–8 (60%) — -0.30
21 1991 1643 133.9 +0.28 +1.30 1.064 51.0% +14 +47 — 48.4% -0.23 5–5 (50%) 5–4 (56%) — +0.91 1999 1923 157.7 +2.57 +3.33 1.144 52.6% +23 -302 -126 65.4% +0.99 15–6 (71%) 16–8 (67%) — +0.49
22 1992 1637 132.1 -0.58 -0.50 0.954 49.4% +19 +5 — 44.1% -0.28 4–8 (33%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.04 2000 1900 146.0 +2.09 +2.25 1.124 52.3% +54 -332 -120 61.3% +0.85 9–2 (82%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.03
23 1993 1682 133.8 +1.16 -2.63 0.932 49.1% +27 -9 -121 50.3% +0.05 15–9 (63%) 21–19 (53%) — +0.53 2001 1763 149.2 -1.17 +2.22 1.001 50.2% +25 -132 +43 53.5% +0.24 6–10 (38%) 7–5 (58%) — -2.55
24 1994 1698 136.2 +1.93 -2.65 0.970 49.9% -30 +46 -86 47.6% -0.14 10–10 (50%) 16–17 (48%) — -1.37 2002 1718 142.5 -0.77 +1.14 0.977 49.8% +5 -139 +119 46.5% -0.05 4–4 (50%) 4–7 (36%) — -0.90
25 1995 1672 142.3 +1.50 -1.49 0.983 49.6% -41 +85 — 49.4% -0.08 3–5 (38%) 6–10 (38%) — -0.88 2003 1727 134.5 +0.10 +0.13 0.980 49.8% +22 -144 +93 48.1% -0.22 6–1 (86%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.36
26 1996 1633 136.1 +2.11 -0.57 1.060 50.8% +20 +51 — 47.4% -0.02 6–7 (46%) 4–7 (36%) — -1.93 2004 1887 148.7 +1.38 +2.62 1.092 51.5% +33 -284 -100 60.2% +0.52 12–6 (67%) 14–7 (67%) — +0.23
27 1997 1674 134.6 +2.54 -1.42 1.022 50.5% -72 +76 -91 44.2% -0.03 7–8 (47%) 9–17 (35%) — -1.35 2005 1862 154.9 +1.31 +3.44 1.125 52.2% +10 -139 -50 60.9% +0.77 8–8 (50%) 7–5 (58%) — -1.12
28 1998 1598 134.8 +3.39 -0.75 1.089 51.6% -4 +127 -33 47.4% +0.18 10–14 (42%) 8–24 (25%) — +1.54 2006 1863 140.5 -0.75 +2.34 1.039 50.6% +65 -104 — 60.0% +0.60 8–3 (73%) 7–4 (64%) — +0.78
29 1999 1667 126.4 +1.31 -2.30 0.922 49.0% -31 +33 -90 49.4% -0.32 6–6 (50%) 12–3 (80%) — -0.28 2007 1907 153.1 +4.21 +1.95 1.186 52.7% +55 — -153 65.2% +0.94 1–1 8–5 (62%) — -1.12
30 2000 1633 131.8 +1.64 -0.83 1.022 50.3% +93 -40 -74 49.1% +0.05 9–11 (45%) 12–11 (52%) — +0.27 2008 1889 153.4 +2.15 +3.22 1.128 51.9% +5 -79 -37 57.0% +0.37 7–5 (58%) 7–4 (64%) — -1.13
31 2001 1502 115.9 -0.76 -1.82 0.772 45.4% +142 +20 — 18.2% -1.55 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.43 2009 1762 145.0 -1.02 -0.24 0.930 49.3% +63 +45 +54 48.5% -0.09 4–4 (50%) 5–4 (56%) — -1.73
32 2002 1486 104.4 +0.20 -1.39 0.783 45.5% — — — 28.6% -2.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.18 2010 1722 106.1 +0.99 -2.77 0.774 46.3% — — +51 27.3% -1.09 1–1 0–1 — -0.60
Career — 1823 139.4 +1.58 -1.32 0.994 50.0% +3 +49 -67 47.5% -0.08 92–106 (46%) 124–143 (46%) 97.7 -0.44 — 1995 155.1 +1.02 +1.86 1.060 51.2% +25 -127 -17 56.7% +0.45 106–67 (61%) 107–77 (58%) 111.9 -1.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.