H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Richard Fromberg vs Nicolas Lapentti H2H: 2-1

Richard Fromberg holds a 2–1 lead over Nicolas Lapentti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Richard Fromberg leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Nicolas Lapentti won the 2000 Estoril fourth round 3-6 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Fromberg
AUS Age 56 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Nicolas Lapentti
ECU Age 49 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 14, 2000* Estoril ATP 250 R16 Clay Nicolas Lapentti #7 3-6 6-3 6-2 Richard Fromberg #60 Match data
Oct 2, 1997* Palermo ATP 250 R32 Clay Richard Fromberg #65 6-1 6-7(3) 6-3 Nicolas Lapentti #84 Match data
Jun 14, 1996* Oporto ATP 250 R16 Clay Richard Fromberg #108 6-2 7-5 Nicolas Lapentti #87 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Fromberg #997 #24 1,214 1,823 247 282 46.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Nicolas Lapentti #885 #6 2,293 1,935 282 280 50.2% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Fromberg Nicolas Lapentti
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1988 5–5 50.0% #103 1,550 0 0 1995 5–0 100.0% #109 1,594 0 1
19 1989 7–13 35.0% #126 1,548 0 0 1996 11–19 36.7% #121 1,576 0 1
20 1990 29–21 58.0% #32 1,662 0 2 1997 17–18 48.6% #63 1,660 0 1
21 1991 18–20 47.4% #95 1,643 0 3 1998 16–29 35.6% #90 1,596 0 1
22 1992 14–22 38.9% #83 1,638 0 3 1999 52–24 68.4% #8 1,883 0 3
23 1993 34–30 53.1% #40 1,680 0 3 2000 40–28 58.8% #24 1,755 0 3
24 1994 25–28 47.2% #58 1,695 0 3 2001 30–22 57.7% #23 1,837 0 4
25 1995 18–20 47.4% #85 1,673 0 3 2002 32–27 54.2% #29 1,714 0 5
26 1996 18–21 46.2% #76 1,633 0 3 2003 20–22 47.6% #57 1,697 0 5
27 1997 19–25 43.2% #77 1,671 0 4 2004 7–14 33.3% #122 1,600 0 5
28 1998 26–31 45.6% #40 1,598 0 4 2005 9–16 36.0% #95 1,579 0 5
29 1999 15–16 48.4% #78 1,666 0 4 2006 12–9 57.1% #67 1,682 0 5
30 2000 18–20 47.4% #84 1,633 0 4 2007 10–14 41.7% #109 1,611 0 5
31 2001 1–8 11.1% #309 1,502 0 4 2008 14–17 45.2% #86 1,658 0 5
32 2002 0–2 0.0% #727 1,486 0 4 2009 6–14 30.0% #97 1,668 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2010 1–7 12.5% #447 1,582 0 5