H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Richard Fromberg vs Slava Dosedel H2H: 2-1
Richard Fromberg holds a 2–1 lead over Slava Dosedel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Richard Fromberg leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Slava Dosedel won the 1998 Monte Carlo Masters second round 7-6(5) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 1998* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Slava Dosedel | 7-6(5) 6-4 | Richard Fromberg | Match data |
| Jul 30, 1994* | Hilversum | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Richard Fromberg | 2-6 7-6(4) 6-1 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
| Apr 29, 1993* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Richard Fromberg | 6-2 7-5 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Fromberg | #997 | #24 | 1,214 | 1,823 | 247 | 282 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Slava Dosedel | #1,027 | #26 | 1,122 | 1,825 | 190 | 184 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Richard Fromberg | Slava Dosedel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1988 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #126 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #32 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #201 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #83 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #40 | 1,680 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #58 | 1,695 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #85 | 1,673 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #66 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 |
| 1996 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 |
| 1997 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #77 | 1,671 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 |
| 1998 | 26–31 | 45.6% | #40 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 |
| 1999 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #78 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 |
| 2000 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #84 | 1,633 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #152 | 1,575 | 0 | 3 |
| 2001 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #309 | 1,502 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #727 | 1,486 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |