H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Richard Fromberg vs Thomas Muster H2H: 0-2
Thomas Muster holds a 2–0 lead over Richard Fromberg in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Thomas Muster leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Muster won the 1993 Florence fourth round 6-7(6) 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 58
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 1993* | Florence | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Thomas Muster | 6-7(6) 6-1 6-3 | Richard Fromberg | Match data |
| Jan 15, 1993* | Sydney Outdoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Thomas Muster | 6-4 7-6(5) | Richard Fromberg | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Fromberg | #997 | #24 | 1,214 | 1,823 | 247 | 282 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Thomas Muster | #1,092 | #1 | 4,474 | 2,161 | 590 | 267 | 68.8% | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 44 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richard Fromberg | Thomas Muster | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #311 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #98 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1988 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #47 | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1989 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #126 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #56 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1990 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #32 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #16 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1991 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #21 | 1,877 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1992 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #83 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #7 | 1,862 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1993 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #40 | 1,680 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 1994 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #58 | 1,695 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 39–22 | 63.9% | #18 | 1,793 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 1995 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #85 | 1,673 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 77–21 | 78.6% | #9 | 1,953 | 0 | 20 |
| 26 | 1996 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #16 | 1,815 | 0 | 23 |
| 27 | 1997 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #77 | 1,671 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 84–17 | 83.2% | #3 | 1,990 | 1 | 35 |
| 28 | 1998 | 26–31 | 45.6% | #40 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 65–21 | 75.6% | #5 | 1,915 | 1 | 42 |
| 29 | 1999 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #78 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #9 | 1,820 | 1 | 44 |
| 30 | 2000 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #84 | 1,633 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #25 | 1,800 | 1 | 44 |
| 31 | 2001 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #309 | 1,502 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #189 | 1,674 | 1 | 44 |
| 32 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #727 | 1,486 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #980 | 1,655 | 1 | 44 |
| 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1075 | 1,608 | 1 | 44 |